2019
DOI: 10.1002/admt.201900645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Customizable Nonplanar Printing of Lithium‐Ion Batteries

Abstract: widely used in consumer electronics due to the advantages of rechargeability and high energy density. [4][5][6] Commercial LIBs are usually fabricated in fixed geometry such as cylinder, coin, and pouch with scrolled or layered planar sheets for each component. [7] Nevertheless, LIBs with customizable geometry are desired for specialized applications such as wearable electronics [8,9] and on-device power systems [10,11] for automobile and aerospace vehicles, For example, LIBs can be made into a watchband to po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(74 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[125] In addition, Yu et al analyzed aerosol-printed 3D electrodes on nonplanar substrates. [126] When used as a full cell, the customized LFP cathode and LTO anode exhibited a maximum aerial capacity of 7.1 mAh cm À2 with 78.4% capacity retention after 30 cycles of cell operation, all of which attributed to the nonplanar geometry and electrode thickness, as shown in Figure 3a-l. [126] Although carbon-based and noncarbon-based 3D electrodes (synthesized and 3D printed) have shown considerable promise due to their cycling stability and elevated specific capacities by synergistically combining various precursor materials, factors such as synthesis parameters, electrode geometry, and cost still must be optimized for these electrodes to gain greater prominence. [127,128]…”
Section: Other Materialsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[125] In addition, Yu et al analyzed aerosol-printed 3D electrodes on nonplanar substrates. [126] When used as a full cell, the customized LFP cathode and LTO anode exhibited a maximum aerial capacity of 7.1 mAh cm À2 with 78.4% capacity retention after 30 cycles of cell operation, all of which attributed to the nonplanar geometry and electrode thickness, as shown in Figure 3a-l. [126] Although carbon-based and noncarbon-based 3D electrodes (synthesized and 3D printed) have shown considerable promise due to their cycling stability and elevated specific capacities by synergistically combining various precursor materials, factors such as synthesis parameters, electrode geometry, and cost still must be optimized for these electrodes to gain greater prominence. [127,128]…”
Section: Other Materialsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…a,b) Images of the aerosol-printed LFP cathode,c,d) similar images of the aerosol-printed LTO anodes, e,f ) SEM micrograph demonstrating the characteristic bulk microstructure of the LFP cathode and LTO anode, respectively, g) schematic representation of the multilayer printing process, h,i) SEM images of the 4-layered and 8-layered aerosol-printed LFP cathode, j) actual photograph of the nonplanar cell lighting a LED light, k) characteristic galvanostatic charge-discharge curves of the nonplanar and planar electrode cell, l) Specific capacity and Coulombic efficiency variation over 30 cycles, for the LFP cathode half-cell. Reproduced with permission [126]. Copyright 2019, Wiley-VCH GmbH.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the good bonding of packages and their encapsulated electrodes and collectors helps dissipate stress/strain in the devices, further providing better mechanical properties. [ 212 ] However, package printing is still in its infant stage. The following section briefly summarizes some recent representative reports on 3D‐printed packaging.…”
Section: D Printing Applications On Other Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…d) Schematics of FDM printed planar and non-planar enclosures. Reproduced with permission [212]. Copyright 2019, Wiley.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, conventional microfabrication methods are playing a dominant role in the manufacturing of these devices, which involve expensive vacuum-based deposition and time-consuming subtractive etching processes. [9,10] As alternatives, additive printing techniques such as inkjet printing, [11,12] aerosol printing, [13][14][15][16] and electrohydrodynamic printing [17,18] with atmospheric-processing capabilities have shown great potentials in the future direction toward the low-cost and largescale manufacturing of flexible and stretchable electronics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%