2005
DOI: 10.2172/877323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Customer Strategies for Responding to Day-Ahead Market HourlyElectricity Pricing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…end-users actually reduce their peak period loads and these reductions do not wear off when the pricing plans are implemented over two consecutive summers. In addition, the work presented in [7] uses CES model to estimate price elasticity of large commercial or industrial users that participate the first large-scale application of real-time pricing in a competitive retail market in the U.S.…”
Section: A Ces Model Motivation and Other Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…end-users actually reduce their peak period loads and these reductions do not wear off when the pricing plans are implemented over two consecutive summers. In addition, the work presented in [7] uses CES model to estimate price elasticity of large commercial or industrial users that participate the first large-scale application of real-time pricing in a competitive retail market in the U.S.…”
Section: A Ces Model Motivation and Other Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Real-time demandresponse programs allow consumers to respond to electricity prices directly, offering mechanisms to help manage the electricity load in times of peak electricity demand to improve market efficiency, increase reliability, and relieve grid congestion. Significant consumer benefits also accrue from realtime demand-response programs, chiefly in the form of cost savings because of lower peak electricity prices, less opportunity for market manipulation by electricity providers, and additional financial incentives to induce their participation in these programs (Goldman et al 2005). …”
Section: Energy Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 6 displays the demand-shedding effect of global set-point adjustment in one of the automated DR test sites in California. This large federal facility (about 1 million square feet) reduced its whole-building power by an average of 811 kW during this 3-hour test by raising the zone temperature set point from 72 to 78 F [15]. Figure 6 shows whole building power for the shed (the lower curve) and the whole-building baseline power predicted if the shed had not occurred.…”
Section: Emcs Carries Out Shed Commands Based On Business Logicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, recent research has examined the results of real-time pricing (RTP) in Niagara Mohawk service territory in upstate New York [15]. The default tariff for all large Niagara Mohawk customers (those with over 2 MW of service) is an RTP tariff; however, they may change to another service provider.…”
Section: Demand Response In New Yorkmentioning
confidence: 99%