2012
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2485240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Customer Integration in New Product Development: A Literature Review Concerning the Appropriateness of Different Customer Integration Methods to Attain Customer Knowledge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(73 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, for idea generation creative techniques like brainstorming or 635 Method are well known and used in product development; thus they still require a great deal of subjective interpretation to allow the practitioner to translate the results into tangible design features [27]. Regarding product development methods with a special focus on integrating customer requirements, it has been confirmed that methods which enable an active customer integration, in comparison to methods where customers, are integrated only passively and are more suitable for attaining customer knowledge within innovation development [28].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, for idea generation creative techniques like brainstorming or 635 Method are well known and used in product development; thus they still require a great deal of subjective interpretation to allow the practitioner to translate the results into tangible design features [27]. Regarding product development methods with a special focus on integrating customer requirements, it has been confirmed that methods which enable an active customer integration, in comparison to methods where customers, are integrated only passively and are more suitable for attaining customer knowledge within innovation development [28].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this paradigm, firms transcend their boundaries in order to engage other resources in developing ideas for innovation (Chesbrough 2003, Afuah andTucci 2012). In this context, customers are seen as a key resource, as they often have high product expertise, as well as experiences and creativity potential gained by regular product usage (Zogaj and Bretschneider 2012). Companies such as Google, Intel, BMW, and SAP are only a few examples that have successfully run WBIPs for customer integration.…”
Section: Web-based Ideation Platformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this paradigm, firms transcend their boundaries in order to engage other resources in developing ideas for innovation (Chesbrough, 2003;Afuah and Tucci, 2012). In this context, customers are seen as a key resource as they often have high product expertise as well as experience and creativity potential gained by regular product usage (Magnusson et al, 2009;Zogaj and Bretschneider, 2012). In this context, Öberg (2010) describes customers as initiators, as co-producers and an inspiration for business development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea that firms benefit from customer-based, collaborative ideation is not new per se. Since the 1980s, small groups of customers have been brought together in face-to-face settings to support new product development (Zogaj and Bretschneider, 2012). Von Hippel's (1986) 'lead user approach' and focus groups are examples of such customer integration (Fern, 1982;Moors et al, 2008;Zogaj and Bretschneider, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation