2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretai.2008.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Customer complaining: The role of tie strength and information control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
122
1
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
7
122
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, in our studies (except for Study 3) we focus on the referrals of brands that are new or unfamiliar to the receivers. It would be an interesting question to examine how rewarded referrals affect responses of those who already had some experiences with the referred product or service and thus possess a certain level of (dis)satisfaction or dissatisfaction with the brand (c.f., Anderson 1998;Mittal et al 2008). …”
Section: Limitations and Directions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, in our studies (except for Study 3) we focus on the referrals of brands that are new or unfamiliar to the receivers. It would be an interesting question to examine how rewarded referrals affect responses of those who already had some experiences with the referred product or service and thus possess a certain level of (dis)satisfaction or dissatisfaction with the brand (c.f., Anderson 1998;Mittal et al 2008). …”
Section: Limitations and Directions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To check if the manipulations of the Facebook posts worked, we adapted three items from the construct Btie strength^by Mittal et al (2008) (items are reported in the Appendix). Participants perceived the relationship to strong ties as closer (M strong = 6.370, SE = .133, CI 95% = 6.100-6.641) compared to weak ties (M weak = 2.022, SE = .182, CI 95% = 1.655-2.389).…”
Section: Manipulation Checkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Customer"s reaction to service failure is affected by many factors such as level of dissatisfaction (Mittal, Huppertz, & Khare, 2008), the likelihood of service recovery (Blodget & Granbois, 1992), the ease of process of complaining (Blodget & Anderson, 2000), and the perception that whether or not company will respond back (Huppertz, 2007). Other factors may include current relationship of consumer with the company (Hui, Ho, & Wan, 2011) and consumer"s attitude toward complaining (Kim, Kim, Im, & Shin, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%