The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Design/methodology/approach: We use qualitative data from manufacturers shortlisted for the UK's Manufacturing Excellence awards over three years. Detailed processes and policies of 68 manufacturers are analysed.Findings: Process structure and product newness require different supply chain configurations, which change as products mature. Supply chain integration is dynamic, and the extent of collaboration between suppliers and customers will be different at different moments in time. We define and discuss four key supply chain configurations: customised; ramp-up; recurring; coordinated.
Research limitations/implications:Future studies on supply chain integration should be controlled for the variation in our configurations. A limitation is the use of data which were derived for an award. We explain how we have mitigated the associated risks.
Practical implications:The configuration of integration will change as the manufacturing plant becomes more familiar with a product. Additionally, different suppliers may provide better support at different stages of a product's lifecycle. To yield better performance, supply chain integration would need to take different forms. Efforts to integrate with suppliers should not be avoided as, when certain conditions are met, integration can lead to improved performance.2 Originality/value: We have identified manufacturers' main process structures and products' newness as two strategic characteristics that differentiate integration approaches with customers and suppliers, and defined four integration configurations. To the authors' knowledge this is the first study to argue that these also define the configuration of supply chain integration.