2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.08.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Customer acceptance mechanisms for home deliveries in metropolitan areas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Early research on the last-mile delivery was aimed at analyzing and quantifying the impact of time slots on transportation costs (Punakivi and Saranen, 2001;Lin and Mahmassani, 2002). Then, researchers looked at the dynamic, or operational, management of time slots in attended home delivery by considering, for example, rules for the acceptance and rejection of deliveries (Bent and van Hentenryck, 2004;Campbell and Savelsbergh, 2005a;Ehmke and Campbell, 2014) or by introducing incentive schemes to encourage the customers to select time slots that could lead to lower transportation costs (Campbell and Savelsbergh, 2005b;Agatz et al, 2008b;Yang et al, 2016).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early research on the last-mile delivery was aimed at analyzing and quantifying the impact of time slots on transportation costs (Punakivi and Saranen, 2001;Lin and Mahmassani, 2002). Then, researchers looked at the dynamic, or operational, management of time slots in attended home delivery by considering, for example, rules for the acceptance and rejection of deliveries (Bent and van Hentenryck, 2004;Campbell and Savelsbergh, 2005a;Ehmke and Campbell, 2014) or by introducing incentive schemes to encourage the customers to select time slots that could lead to lower transportation costs (Campbell and Savelsbergh, 2005b;Agatz et al, 2008b;Yang et al, 2016).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…or calling the purchaser to confirm attendance (Punakivi and Saranen, 2001;Ehmke, 2012a). These solutions are helpful to the problem, but their disadvantages are significant: time wasted for phone calls or for waiting for delivery, product security issues, lockers storage condition issue, reception boxes size issue (Iwan et al, 2016;Lowe and Rigby, 2014;Ehmke and Campbell, 2014). These disadvantages are particularly noticeable in food delivery.…”
Section: E-grocery Home Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As regards the first method, due to the perishability and storage condition-sensitivity of food, attendance of customer (or receiver in general) is often required at the moment of home delivery (Hsu et al, 2007). This problem is known in the literature as the AHDP (Ehmke, 2012a;Ehmke and Campbell, 2014). As the attendance of a customer is hard to predict, home delivery usually results in high rate of failures (Agatz et al, 2011;Gevaers et al, 2011;Lowe and Rigby, 2014) and can lead to high delivery costs, waste of waiting time ( for the customer), and waste of energy spent in transportation.…”
Section: E-grocery Home Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The DOD is defined by the ratio between expected numbers of LRC #LRC and overall customers #ERC + #LRC:The DOD is one main dimension to classify DVRPs with stochastic requests. A moderate DOD may be experienced for applications such as oil distribution, patient transports, or grocery delivery [9,38]. The range of applications with high DOD comprises emergency vehicles or courier services [27,47].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%