2018
DOI: 10.1002/bem.22148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Custom edge‐element FEM solver and its application to eddy‐current simulation of realistic 2M‐element human brain phantom

Abstract: Extensive research papers of three-dimensional computational techniques are widely used for the investigation of human brain pathophysiology. Eddy current analyzing could provide an indication of conductivity change within a biological body. A significant obstacle to current trend analyses is the development of a numerically stable and efficiency-finite element scheme that performs well at low frequency and does not require a large number of degrees of freedom. Here, a custom finite element method (FEM) solver… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MAXWELL software was used to simulate and solve the same model. For this practical problem, the simulation conditions are as follows 39,40 : Maxwell 3D Version 6 is the analysis type; The boundary condition is the default natural boundary condition in software. The excitation condition is current; solution type is magnetostatic; Mesh type and size are adaptive.…”
Section: Results Of Traditional Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MAXWELL software was used to simulate and solve the same model. For this practical problem, the simulation conditions are as follows 39,40 : Maxwell 3D Version 6 is the analysis type; The boundary condition is the default natural boundary condition in software. The excitation condition is current; solution type is magnetostatic; Mesh type and size are adaptive.…”
Section: Results Of Traditional Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By putting mesh information of all discretised subdomains together, the problem becomes finding a solution of equations with a sparse stiffness matrix. Techniques have been proposed for hastening the solving process using FE A-V form Galerkin methods, including polishing the sparse stiffness matrix, re-ordering and incomplete LU decomposing, optimised initial preconditioner, perturbed matrix, and weakly coupled effect [8,19,[23][24][25]. In addition, other FE models, including the use of reduced magnetic vector potential [26] and alternating current field measurement (ACFM) [27], have been utilised to calculate the field and sensor response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By putting mesh information of all discretised subdomains together, the problem becomes finding the solution of equations with sparse stiffness matrix. Techniques have been proposed for hastening the solving process using FE A-V form Galerkin methods, including polishing the sparse stiffness matrix -the re-ordering and incomplete LU decomposing, optimised initial preconditioner, perturbed matrix, and weakly coupled effect [8,19,[23][24][25]. Besides, other FE models including the use of reduced magnetic vector potential [26] and alternating current field measurement (ACFM) [27] have been utilised to calculate the field and sensor response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%