2012
DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Custodiol versus blood cardioplegia in complex cardiac operations: an Australian experience

Abstract: The use of Custodiol is convenient, simple and at least as safe as tepid blood cardioplegia for myocardial protection in complex cardiac operations. A randomized prospective comparison of myocardial protection strategies is warranted.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
57
0
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
57
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the patients undergoing CABG using SVGs alone had a higher expected operative risk according to EuroSCORE II (P < 0.0001), the use of SVGs alone for myocardial revascularization was a risk factor for hospital death according to the univariable but not the multivariable analysis. Neither the various solutions for myocardial protection nor the various surgical strategies (off-pump, beating heart on-pump, and on-pump technique) that have been used had a different impact on hospital mortality [3,11,16]. Actually, according to the present authors' institutional policy, off-pump and beating heart on-pump techniques were used rarely (9 %) and only in the presence of an unclampable ascending aorta; the single-dose Custodiol-HTK solution was sometimes adopted to reduce the duration of surgery [20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the patients undergoing CABG using SVGs alone had a higher expected operative risk according to EuroSCORE II (P < 0.0001), the use of SVGs alone for myocardial revascularization was a risk factor for hospital death according to the univariable but not the multivariable analysis. Neither the various solutions for myocardial protection nor the various surgical strategies (off-pump, beating heart on-pump, and on-pump technique) that have been used had a different impact on hospital mortality [3,11,16]. Actually, according to the present authors' institutional policy, off-pump and beating heart on-pump techniques were used rarely (9 %) and only in the presence of an unclampable ascending aorta; the single-dose Custodiol-HTK solution was sometimes adopted to reduce the duration of surgery [20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a period of myocardial ischemia was used, myocardial protection was usually achieved with multidose cold blood cardioplegia delivered both in an antegrade and retrograde mode. A single-dose crystalloid solution (Custodiol-HTK ® solution; Essential Pharma, Newtown, PA, United States of America) was sometimes preferred, especially when longer ischemic times were expected [16]. Off-pump and beating heart onpump techniques were adopted only in the presence of a diffusely calcified ascending aorta (confirmed by epiaortic ultrasonography scanning) to avoid the risk of cracking atherosclerotic plaques by the aortic crossclamp [17].…”
Section: Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The improvement of myocardium tolerance to ischemia for high-risk patients with complex congenital heart disease is a key issue (3). However, the optimal myocardial protection strategy for high-risk patients with complex congenital heart disease remains controversial (1,4). There are two main groups of cardioplegic solutions; one is based on extracellular components with high potassium, magnesium and bicarbonate levels and the other is based on intracellular electrolytes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This seems to be in accordance also with Braathen et coll. where percentage of patients with LVEF >50% were higher, even if statistically not significant, in the group treated with CCP (12) but not with Viana et al that, on the other hand, reported a lower percentage of patients with impaired cardiac function (Severe LV dysfunction or NYHA > II) in CCP group compared with BCP group (13).…”
Section: Editorialmentioning
confidence: 71%