2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-01045-4_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CUST: CNN for Ultrasound Thermal Image Reconstruction Using Sparse Time-of-Flight Information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One-dimensional studies include atmospheric temperature profiles as functions of altitude (a feedforward neural network, FFNN, with a root mean squared error (RMSE) between ±0.4-1 K [26] and ±1.61 K [27]), temperature and concentration profiles of gases during a combustion reaction (multilayer perceptron (MLP) network with an RMSE between 1.2-8.1% [28]), and a 1D convolutional neural network (CNN) for optical IR thermometer in molten metals [29]. For two-dimensional studies, hyperspectral imaging (RMSE of ±1.14 K [30]), time-of-flight for ultrasonic waves (a mean error near ±0.12 K [31]), 2D flame surface and temperature by CNN [32] (with an unreported RMSE), and flame spectral absorption images (RMSE of ±13.5K [33]) were used to determine temperature. The hyperspectral study developed a surface temperature-deep convolutional neural network (ST-DCNN) but trained it on data only at a single position rather than the full temperature distribution of the surface [30].…”
Section: Neural Network Approaches To Temperature Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One-dimensional studies include atmospheric temperature profiles as functions of altitude (a feedforward neural network, FFNN, with a root mean squared error (RMSE) between ±0.4-1 K [26] and ±1.61 K [27]), temperature and concentration profiles of gases during a combustion reaction (multilayer perceptron (MLP) network with an RMSE between 1.2-8.1% [28]), and a 1D convolutional neural network (CNN) for optical IR thermometer in molten metals [29]. For two-dimensional studies, hyperspectral imaging (RMSE of ±1.14 K [30]), time-of-flight for ultrasonic waves (a mean error near ±0.12 K [31]), 2D flame surface and temperature by CNN [32] (with an unreported RMSE), and flame spectral absorption images (RMSE of ±13.5K [33]) were used to determine temperature. The hyperspectral study developed a surface temperature-deep convolutional neural network (ST-DCNN) but trained it on data only at a single position rather than the full temperature distribution of the surface [30].…”
Section: Neural Network Approaches To Temperature Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This hypothesis is based on planar temperature reconstruction from a series of images taken using thermochromic liquid crystals (TLC), where a pixel-topixel based simply connected feedforward network (P2P-SCFFNN) achieved a mean absolute deviation near ±0.1 K over a 4.4 K range from 291.1 to 295.5 K [14]. NNs have been used to recreate temperature from other signals as well, such as IR thermometry of a point [15], atmospheric temperature at varying altitudes [16], flame temperature and composition [17][18][19], and time-of-flight for ultrasonic waves [20]. Previous works' fundamental limitations are that they cannot create a 2D image or have not been applied to fluorescence thermometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include measuring atmospheric temperatures as a function of altitude, 20 determining temperature during combustion, 21 hyperspectral imaging trained on temperature at a single point, 22 and determining temperature distributions based on time-of-flight of ultrasound through tissue. 23 Based on these few instances with temperature and other sensors benefiting from machine learning use, 24 there is the potential to improve temperature sensing in biological system through the use of neural networks to interpret temperature sensitive signals.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, the focus of machine learning via neural networks for thermal application has historically been on image recognition in thermal images. A limited number of studies have used feed forward or convolution neural networks to predict temperature based on another signal. These include measuring atmospheric temperatures as a function of altitude, determining temperature during combustion, hyperspectral imaging trained on temperature at a single point, and determining temperature distributions based on time-of-flight of ultrasound through tissue . Based on these few instances with temperature and other sensors benefiting from machine learning use, there is the potential to improve temperature sensing in biological system through the use of neural networks to interpret temperature sensitive signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%