Cuspal deflection and microleakage in pre molar teeth restored with bulk-fill resin-based composites

Güler, Eda; Karaman, Emel

doi:10.1080/01694243.2014.945233

Cited by 7 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…After reading the full text, 129 articles were excluded, mainly for not reporting the clinical time. Thus, four studies were selected for data extraction, and three of them were included in the meta‐analysis . One study could not be included in the systematic review and meta‐analysis because the total restorative time was not reported in minutes or seconds .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Three laboratory studies were selected. In the in vitro studies, restorations were placed in human permanent molars and premolars and primary molars . One included study was conducted in Brazil, one in Iran and one in Turkey …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Although all of the in vitro studies presented similar sample size per group, only one mentioned the sample size calculation, the use of materials according to the manufacturers’ instructions, the restoration procedures performed by a single operator, and blinding of the examiner. Two presented a high risk of bias for the most domains, and one study presented a low risk of bias for most domains…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Full‐body bulk‐fill resin composites dispense the final capping layer and can be used to fill the whole cavity. This resin group has a shorter application time, which is always desirable in daily clinical practice …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…despite the small number of included studies and the short follow‐up periods . Nevertheless, bulk‐fill resin composites seem to be an attractive alternative for posterior restorations, mainly due to simplification of the technique and shorter restorative time …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Do bulk‐fill resins decrease the restorative time in posterior teeth? A systematic review and meta‐analysis of in vitro studies

Bellinaso

Soares

Rocha

2019

J of Invest & Clin Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of the present study was to compare the restorative time for filling cavities in posterior teeth using bulk‐fill and conventional resin composites through a systematic review and meta‐analysis. A search for clinical trials and laboratory studies was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, the Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature database, the Brazilian Library in Dentistry, Cochrane Library, Clinical Trials, and ReBEC (Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clínicos) databases without publication year or language restriction. Two reviewers identified eligible studies according to the inclusion criteria: bulk‐fill compared to conventional resin in class I or II, and the restorative time as an outcome. A meta‐analysis of the restorative time mean difference between composites was performed (inverse variance method, random effects model; Z‐test, P ≤ .05). From the 662 eligible studies, 133 were selected for full‐text analysis; three were included in the systematic review and in the meta‐analysis. Overall, the restorative time was lower when bulk‐fill was used (P = .0007, Z = 3.37), as the subgroup full‐body bulk‐fill (P < .00001, Z = 21.00). There was no difference in restorative time between flowable bulk‐fill and conventional resins (P = .08, Z = 1.76). Moderate‐to‐substantial heterogeneity was detected. Full‐body bulk‐fill composites decrease the restorative time in posterior teeth compared to conventional resins. Full‐body bulk‐fill resins require a shorter restorative time to perform restorations in posterior teeth than conventional resins, but the same is not valid for flowable bulk‐fill resin composites.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations