2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.eml.2017.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cusp singularity-based bistability criterion for geometrically nonlinear structures

Abstract: This letter introduces a method of analyzing multi-stable truss structures and unit cells of engineered materials using the third order derivative of the formulated system's potential energy function. The method can determine systematically all the cusp point singularities arising at the onset of bistability, and therefore identify the regions of hysteretic superelasticity and superplasticity from the usual geometrical nonlinearity in the solution space. The ability to design these behaviors is a great advanta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the system parameters a and b are varied in a design process, a stable equilibrium solution {x,y} of the equilibrium equations (17) may lose uniqueness at a point of supercritical pitchfork bifurcation [23] and split into two stable and one unstable solutions. For the systems with one degree of freedom, this occurred at the cusp points (8) within limit set (10) of the potential (6), and these points satisfied the additional condition: 0, see [19] for more details. We suggest that such a condition should generally apply to an internal degree of freedom responsible for the destabilization.…”
Section: Structural Destabilization and Bifurcation Pointsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…When the system parameters a and b are varied in a design process, a stable equilibrium solution {x,y} of the equilibrium equations (17) may lose uniqueness at a point of supercritical pitchfork bifurcation [23] and split into two stable and one unstable solutions. For the systems with one degree of freedom, this occurred at the cusp points (8) within limit set (10) of the potential (6), and these points satisfied the additional condition: 0, see [19] for more details. We suggest that such a condition should generally apply to an internal degree of freedom responsible for the destabilization.…”
Section: Structural Destabilization and Bifurcation Pointsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The condition (19) replaces 0 used in (10) for the analysis of structures with one independent degree of freedom. In an immediate vicinity of a limit point, the structure is in equilibrium, and therefore the criterion for an inflection point (structural destabilization) is the following:…”
Section: Structural Destabilization and Bifurcation Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations