PsycEXTRA Dataset 2012
DOI: 10.1037/e608522012-014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cusp Catastrophe Models for Cognitive Workload and Fatigue in a Vigilance Task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of these models aim to provide a detailed account of behavior, but draw on different cognitive modeling frameworks. Examples include non-linear dynamic models based on catastrophe theory (Guastello et al, 2015), cognitive architectural models based on ACT-R (Juvina and Taatgen, 2007), detailed cognitive processing models based on the HY-GENE hypothesis generation framework (Harbison et al, 2011), and a number of connectionist models (Chatham et al, 2011;Sylvester et al, 2013).…”
Section: Previous Cognitive Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these models aim to provide a detailed account of behavior, but draw on different cognitive modeling frameworks. Examples include non-linear dynamic models based on catastrophe theory (Guastello et al, 2015), cognitive architectural models based on ACT-R (Juvina and Taatgen, 2007), detailed cognitive processing models based on the HY-GENE hypothesis generation framework (Harbison et al, 2011), and a number of connectionist models (Chatham et al, 2011;Sylvester et al, 2013).…”
Section: Previous Cognitive Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nexus of the phenomena has perplexed psychologists for over a century (Ackerman, 2011). A viable theoretical solution is to capture CWLF as two separate cusp catastrophe processes (Guastello, 2003; Guastello, Boeh, et al, 2013; Guastello, Boeh, Schimmels, et al, 2012; Guastello, Boeh, Shumaker, & Schimmels, 2012; Guastello, Malon, et al, 2012; Guastello, Shircel, et al, 2013). The structures of the two models are the same (see Figure 1), but the contributing variables are different.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4. In the particular case of a vigilance task, frustration was the bifurcation (rigidity) variable in the workload model, and completion of a secondary task was the bifurcation variable in the fatigue model (Guastello, Malon, et al, 2012). Work speed, which was system driven rather than voluntary, acted as a compensatory ability; slowing down produced smaller increases in errors over time compared to speeding up.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation