Low Impact Development 2010 2010
DOI: 10.1061/41099(367)36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Curve Numbers and Urban Runoff Modeling—Application Limitations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As we will see in Section 5, these adaptations of the SCS‐CN method allows one to reproduce correctly the runoff volume, through a reasonable calibration of CN, but not the runoff peak and its timing. In principle, it is indeed inappropriate to use the SCS‐CN method as an infiltration equation for estimating the incremental rainfall excess during a storm event [ Eli and Lamont , ; Grimaldi et al ., ].…”
Section: Hydrological Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we will see in Section 5, these adaptations of the SCS‐CN method allows one to reproduce correctly the runoff volume, through a reasonable calibration of CN, but not the runoff peak and its timing. In principle, it is indeed inappropriate to use the SCS‐CN method as an infiltration equation for estimating the incremental rainfall excess during a storm event [ Eli and Lamont , ; Grimaldi et al ., ].…”
Section: Hydrological Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the separation of losses from gross rainfall, plays the major role when trying to determine the watershed hydrograph. In the case of small and ungauged basins, where discharge data are lacking, the modeller is often forced to use lumped and empiric models such as the SCS-CN method, augmenting the uncertainty since the SCS-CN should be not be used for describing the infiltration evolution over time (3,4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular for small and ungauged basins that usually are lacking of discharge observations, where the hydrologist is forced to apply semi-empirical rainfall-runoff models, such as the Soil Conservation Service-Curve Number (SCS-CN) method (1,2). The SCS-CN method is worldwide used, both from a practical point of view, since it is included in many hydrological software, both in research papers (3,4), because of is simplicity, being fully applicable because it needs just one parameter (the Curve Number) well classified with respect to soil properties. Although the method is well known and used, it is not appropriate for estimating the incremental rainfall excess during a storm event, basically because it is an empiric relationship and not an infiltration equation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NRCS-CN is a simple and commonly used approach to estimate the total net rainfall volume generated by a gross rainfall, but it was developed to be used with daily rainfall data and is not appropriate for sub-daily resolution analyses (Eli and Lamont, 2010;Woodward et al, 2010). To overcome this drawback, the Green-Ampt infiltration scheme was included in a mixed procedure aiming to distribute in time the information provided by the NRCS-CN method.…”
Section: Downloaded By [George Mason University] At 04:55 27 Decembermentioning
confidence: 99%