2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2005.tb03742.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Curve Number Hydrology in Water Quality Modeling: Uses, Abuses, and Future Directions

Abstract: Although the curve number method of the Natural Resources Conservation Service has been used as the foundation of the hydrology algorithms in many nonpoint source water quality models, there are significant problematic issues with the way it has been implemented and interpreted that are not generally recognized. This usage is based on misconceptions about the meaning of the runoff value that the method computes, which is a likely fundamental cause of uncertainty in subsequent erosion and pollutant loading pred… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
136
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 220 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
136
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Simonit and Perrings (1) applied the empirical CN model in a humid tropical forest, where it is known not to work, at an inappropriate spatial scale (pixels), and used an invalid monthly time step requiring use of an invalid value of the parameter λ. Hydrological modeling of land-use change effects requires a model that is capable of predicting the effects of those changes on flow path and groundwater dynamics, which the CN methodology cannot (4). The cumulative effects of these hydrological modeling errors render the land-use change-related hydrological conclusions in Simonit and Perrings (1) invalid.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simonit and Perrings (1) applied the empirical CN model in a humid tropical forest, where it is known not to work, at an inappropriate spatial scale (pixels), and used an invalid monthly time step requiring use of an invalid value of the parameter λ. Hydrological modeling of land-use change effects requires a model that is capable of predicting the effects of those changes on flow path and groundwater dynamics, which the CN methodology cannot (4). The cumulative effects of these hydrological modeling errors render the land-use change-related hydrological conclusions in Simonit and Perrings (1) invalid.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another example is the use of runoff curve number to simulate the surface runoff behavior. This approach does not account for saturation excess runoff or contributions from variable source areas (Garen and Moore, 2005;Easton et al, 2008). Although the simulation results in our research met the calibration criteria, the model performance can be improved if precipitation data from additional gages become available in the basin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[12] The spatial scale of conservation planning depends upon numerous factors, including management objectives, available data resolution, dominant ecological processes, and potential sociopolitical constraints [Garen and Moore, 2005;Walter et al, 2007]. To achieve the specific goals of water quality control, conservation practices targeting should be performed within a smaller geographic unit, which ultimately allows us to better evaluate targeted management plan.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%