2003
DOI: 10.1142/s0218271803004407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Curvature Quintessence Matched With Observational Data

Abstract: Quintessence issues can be achieved by taking into account higher order curvature invariants into the effective action of gravitational field. Such an approach is naturally related to fundamental theories of quantum gravity which predict higher order terms in loop expansion of quantum fields in curved space-times. In this framework, we obtain a class of cosmological solutions which are fitted against cosmological data. We reproduce encouraging results able to fit high redshift supernovae and WMAP observations.… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
528
1
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 612 publications
(547 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
11
528
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also clear that power-law solutions do exist in general for f (R) models, but they can be found using different methods [24]. Assuming, in general, a power-law H(a), one finds R as a function of a, and then, in principle, f = f (R(a)).…”
Section: Non-noether Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also clear that power-law solutions do exist in general for f (R) models, but they can be found using different methods [24]. Assuming, in general, a power-law H(a), one finds R as a function of a, and then, in principle, f = f (R(a)).…”
Section: Non-noether Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible way out is to evaluate PPN parameters for the case of f (R) gravity exploiting the analogy between fourth order theories and scalar -tensor ones. Such an analysis has been indeed performed by some of us [35] and will be presented in a forthcoming work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…(20) and the constraints in Eqs. (29) and (30). For the best fit model, it is t 0 = 10.3 Gyr, while t 0 ranges between 10 and 11 Gyr for the parameters running in their 1σ confidence regions.…”
Section: A F (R) = βR Nmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In particular, in Ref. [30], some of us have also successfully tested a simplified version of this model (with no matter term) against the SNeIa Hubble diagram. Moreover, this kind of Lagrangian has also been investigated in the framework of the Palatini approach [24,28].…”
Section: A the Power Law Lagrangianmentioning
confidence: 99%