1937
DOI: 10.2307/1167919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Curriculum Investigations at the Teacher-Training, College, and University Levels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1938
1938
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An entire issue of the 1934 Review of Educational Research was devoted to reviewing studies related to curriculum in institutions of higher education nationwide, including those that prepared teachers for the classroom. Peik (1934) found that the majority of studies indicated there was much variation throughout the curriculum. Whipple (1930), secretary for the National Society for the Study of Education, adamantly opposed standardization and claimed that state prescription, authorship, and printing of textbooks was "certainly one of the most effective schemes ever contrived to discourage initiative, to retard the spread of new ideas, to encourage mediocrity, to hamper the work of the teacher, to increase the cost of the textbook, and to tempt political interference" (p. 51).…”
Section: S and 1930smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An entire issue of the 1934 Review of Educational Research was devoted to reviewing studies related to curriculum in institutions of higher education nationwide, including those that prepared teachers for the classroom. Peik (1934) found that the majority of studies indicated there was much variation throughout the curriculum. Whipple (1930), secretary for the National Society for the Study of Education, adamantly opposed standardization and claimed that state prescription, authorship, and printing of textbooks was "certainly one of the most effective schemes ever contrived to discourage initiative, to retard the spread of new ideas, to encourage mediocrity, to hamper the work of the teacher, to increase the cost of the textbook, and to tempt political interference" (p. 51).…”
Section: S and 1930smentioning
confidence: 99%