2010
DOI: 10.1007/s12528-010-9036-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Curriculum, intellectual property rights and open educational resources in British universities—and beyond

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, existing studies on this subject are not sufficiently conclusive (Feliz, Feliz, & Ricoy, 2013;Hawkridge, Armellini, Nikoi, Rowlett, & Witthaus, 2010;McGill, Currier, Duncan, & Douglas, 2008). To this must be added the precarious conditions in which teaching activities are carried out in some of the existing experiences, which, in several cases, do not go beyond the mere reproduction of traditional education practices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, existing studies on this subject are not sufficiently conclusive (Feliz, Feliz, & Ricoy, 2013;Hawkridge, Armellini, Nikoi, Rowlett, & Witthaus, 2010;McGill, Currier, Duncan, & Douglas, 2008). To this must be added the precarious conditions in which teaching activities are carried out in some of the existing experiences, which, in several cases, do not go beyond the mere reproduction of traditional education practices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence gathered from academics through interviews also suggests that many academics want a design structure into which they can place their own content and through which they can adapt such content to their teaching (Nikoi, 2010). To be successful at creating and/or adapting teaching materials as OER, staff development departments within higher education institutions might consider the introduction of training programmes that build the capacity of individual academics to design open teaching and learning materials.…”
Section: Design For Openness and Usabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence of the impact of OER on teaching has become a subject of debate (Harley, 2008;McGill et al, 2008). The problem of lack of evidence could be attributed partly to the persistence of supply-driven OER development models, and partly to the concomitant neglect of demand-led models (Hawkridge, Armellini, Nikoi, Rowlett, & Witthaus, 2010) in response to expressed teaching and learning needs; for example, as identified by OER Africa (2008). In the development of CORRE, we devised a mechanism for gathering both quantitative and qualitative evidence on OER use, to enable us to gather information about the context in which a need arose and what difference an OER made.…”
Section: Oer Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of governments, most hold ownership of creations generated within their systems but this competes with the use of CC licenses, which are increasingly being used in many institutions to ensure greater distribution (Okediji, 2016). In academic institutions, institutional guidelines can lack clarity, making it difficult to gauge whether copyright is owned by the institution or the faculty member who developed the content (Hawkridge et al, 2010;Ncube, 2011). Poor knowledge amongst librarian and university staff is also an issue with developing countries being the most affected (Okiy, 2005).…”
Section: Oers and The Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often, even stakeholders in the book-publishing sector are poorly informed of copyright (Mahama, 2012 While copyright law remains the prime preserving agent of authors' rights (McCoy, 2009), the CC movement has been making an impression in the educational and publishing sphere as an alternative or supplement to copyright (Garcelon, 2009). For OER providers, CC licenses are a more favorable option than seeking copyright protection due their cost-free nature (Collins, 2013) and the ease with which the community can understand them (Kapitzke, Dezuanni & Iyer, 2011 With the increasing number of educational institutions creating OERs, agreements requiring content-creating academics to consent to give away their intellectual property to the university has become more common (Hawkridge et al, 2010;Ncube, 2011 (Hawkridge et al, 2010). Similarly, the case study organizations also negotiate these matters early.…”
Section: Copyrightmentioning
confidence: 99%