1984
DOI: 10.1080/00405848409543127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Curriculum development in the arts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These learning models are often a mixed reflection of the learning theories and the educators' experiences over the course of their careers. For example, objective models [18] offer a static view of design whereas interaction models [19] perceive design as a context-specific phenomenon with some level of fluidity that follows a temporal path towards its alignment with students' learning requirements. Other learning models, such as the naturalistic model [20], argue that curriculum design should be a function of the collective intelligence, where a consensus-based platform of ideas and shared beliefs can be established to draw overarching goals and pathways for a particular curriculum.…”
Section: Learning Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These learning models are often a mixed reflection of the learning theories and the educators' experiences over the course of their careers. For example, objective models [18] offer a static view of design whereas interaction models [19] perceive design as a context-specific phenomenon with some level of fluidity that follows a temporal path towards its alignment with students' learning requirements. Other learning models, such as the naturalistic model [20], argue that curriculum design should be a function of the collective intelligence, where a consensus-based platform of ideas and shared beliefs can be established to draw overarching goals and pathways for a particular curriculum.…”
Section: Learning Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%