2014
DOI: 10.1253/circj.cj-13-0886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current Venous Thromboembolism Management and Outcomes in Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
77
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
77
2
Order By: Relevance
“…2, 4 Anticoagulant therapy is currently recommended by the Japanese Circulation Society as the standard of care for PE and DVT, for which unfractionated heparin (UFH) or fondaparinux, and warfarin are used in Japan. 2 Dose adjustment, however, is a complicated matter when 2 drugs are used (warfarin with UFH or fondaparinux).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2, 4 Anticoagulant therapy is currently recommended by the Japanese Circulation Society as the standard of care for PE and DVT, for which unfractionated heparin (UFH) or fondaparinux, and warfarin are used in Japan. 2 Dose adjustment, however, is a complicated matter when 2 drugs are used (warfarin with UFH or fondaparinux).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the Japanese guidelines recognize that thrombolysis is indicated for a wider range of diseases and that thrombolysis can be considered for patients with shock, those with unstable hemodynamics, and those with right heart strain Grade 2A 1 . Thus, the frequency of thrombolysis in patients with pulmonary embolism in Japan is higher than that in Europe and the US 23 embolism was associated with a decreased risk of all-cause mortality, but with increased risks of major bleeding and intracerebral hemorrhage 25 . Thus, there is still no de nitive conclusion about whether thrombolysis is indicated for acute pulmonary embolism, and further studies are needed to evaluate its indications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Case-fatality of PE during treatment 0.015 0.0091-0.0209 [32] Case-fatality of PE asymptomatic 0.270 0.164-0.376 [33] Case-fatality of PE immediately 0.220 0.134-0.306 [33] Case-fatality of DVT (proximal or distal) during treatment 0.004 0.0024-0.0056 [32] Annual probability of recurrent VTE Year 1-2 0.081 0.049-0.113 [21] Year 3-5 0.029 0.018-0.041 [22] treated with rivaroxaban or apixaban versus enoxaparin [20]. In the Markov process, patients with a VTE history might suffer a recurrent VTE and develop post-PTS (in patients who suffered a DVT) or CTEPH (in patients who suffered a PE).…”
Section: Clinical Inputsmentioning
confidence: 99%