“…Whilst there have been concerns over their additional costs versus standard insulins such as NPH insulins, and whether this represents value (Caires de Souza et al, 2014;Almeida et al, 2018;Ewen et al, 2019;Hemmingsen et al, 2021), recent published studies, including systematic reviews, have shown that their higher acquisition costs can be offset by savings from averted costs associated with hypoglycaemia and other complications (Jendle et al, 2020;Lee et al, 2020;Shafie and Ng, 2020;Tricco et al, 2021) generating medium to long-term savings. As a result, long-acting insulin analogues are now the most widely prescribed insulins among high-income and high middle-income countries, with sales growing in other countries including Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries as well as Bangladesh and India (Silver et al, 2018;Ewen et al, 2019;Godman et al, 2021a;Haque et al, 2021a;Godman et al, 2021c;Godman et al, 2021d). This is welcomed as there have been concerns in CEE countries regarding the availability and funding of biological medicines to treat patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, and inflammatory bowel disease (Putrik et al, 2014;Kostic et al, 2017;Baumgart et al, 2019).…”