We appreciate the interest of Thuny et al and Pericas et al in our work.1 Both sets of authors raised concerns about potentially underestimating the real incidence of infective endocarditis (IE) in our study. Although this possibility cannot be completely excluded, it is important to note that the incidence of IE in our series is similar to what was reported in the Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valve (PARTNER) trial.
2Thuny et al pointed out the limitations of transesophageal echocardiography for diagnosing IE, including periannular complications, highlighting the potential added value of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in this setting. Unfortunately, no data on the use of this imaging technique were available in our study. However, transesophageal echocardiography has been demonstrated to be useful in detecting periannular complications within the context of IE, with a diagnostic accuracy of >90%, 3,4 although certain technical aspects of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) may alter this rate somewhat. In addition, the use of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography within the first 6 months after intervention (â50% of patients in our series) may be limited by the potential occurrence of false-positive results related to concomitant inflammatory status in this early postintervention period. 4 Novel imaging techniques are undoubtedly playing an emerging role in the diagnostic workup of IE, and we agree that the Duke criteria may lack sensitivity in this scenario. However, more studies are needed to validate the accuracy of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography before definitive recommendations can be made.Pericas et al suggest that conventional surgery may improve results in patients who develop heart failure as a complication of IE. As already pointed out in our article, 1 we essentially agree with this comment, which in fact follows the current guidelines on the management of IE that recommend surgery when heart failure occurs. However, one should bear in mind that a very high or prohibitive surgical risk remains the most important reason for performing TAVI nowadays, in addition to alternative factors precluding surgery such as porcelain aorta or frailty. This is the most likely reason justifying the very low rate of surgical valve explantation in our multicenter series despite of the high rate of IE complications. (Although the use of surgical risk scores in TAVI candidates has limitations, the mean logistic EuroSCORE of â25% in our series equates to a high risk state.) It seems obvious that the work of Pericas et al 5 cannot be used to support surgery in this context, given the inherent limitations associated with a case series review (relevant information omitted, major selection bias). As also pointed out in our article, further studies are needed to determine whether a higher rate of surgery in patients with IE complications, particularly heart failure, would be associated with bett...