2022
DOI: 10.1007/s43069-022-00134-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current Trends in Operating Room Scheduling 2015 to 2020: a Literature Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 234 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was a systematic evaluation plan for the block assignment models that altered the run times and weights for the two components in the objective function, resulting in 24 total instances for models 1A–1D and model 2 8 . Model 3 only had nine instances due the two phase formulation reducing the ways parameters could be varied 8 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…There was a systematic evaluation plan for the block assignment models that altered the run times and weights for the two components in the objective function, resulting in 24 total instances for models 1A–1D and model 2 8 . Model 3 only had nine instances due the two phase formulation reducing the ways parameters could be varied 8 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cardoen et al, 2 4 As a part of a larger study, we reviewed 246 OR scheduling papers from 2015 to 2020, of which 67 (27%) used a simulation model. 15 However, none of these simulation models incorporated the SPD. 15 There are a handful of papers that developed simulation models of an SPD.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations