2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.01.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current trends and recent advances on food authenticity technologies and chemometric approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
70
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
(132 reference statements)
0
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The geographical origin of foods is an issue of high concern and interest, as specific food labels are nowadays promoted; protected designation of origin (PDO), protected geographical indication (PGI), and traditional specialities guaranteed (TSG) [1]. Towards this, the various available extraction techniques (e.g., liquid-liquid-extraction (LLE), solid-phase-extraction (SPE), solid-phase microextraction (SPME), stir bar sorptive-extraction (SBSE), microwave-assisted extraction (MAE), as well as the quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe extraction (QuEChERS)), are associated by an array of modern analytical methods (e.g., mass spectrometry, spectroscopy, chromatographic and hyphenated, electronic sensors) and chemometric tools (e.g., exploratory analysis, classification/discriminant analyses, regression analyses/prediction models) for monitoring and protecting food adulteration and authentication [23]. In this context, FT-IR spectroscopy when combined with chemometrics, allowed the direct classification of carobs per country [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geographical origin of foods is an issue of high concern and interest, as specific food labels are nowadays promoted; protected designation of origin (PDO), protected geographical indication (PGI), and traditional specialities guaranteed (TSG) [1]. Towards this, the various available extraction techniques (e.g., liquid-liquid-extraction (LLE), solid-phase-extraction (SPE), solid-phase microextraction (SPME), stir bar sorptive-extraction (SBSE), microwave-assisted extraction (MAE), as well as the quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe extraction (QuEChERS)), are associated by an array of modern analytical methods (e.g., mass spectrometry, spectroscopy, chromatographic and hyphenated, electronic sensors) and chemometric tools (e.g., exploratory analysis, classification/discriminant analyses, regression analyses/prediction models) for monitoring and protecting food adulteration and authentication [23]. In this context, FT-IR spectroscopy when combined with chemometrics, allowed the direct classification of carobs per country [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identification of 56 common peaks volatile compounds in this study is not necessarily an intermediate process, and 15 characteristic peaks can be obtained without identifying a single volatile flavour component. This method can help to monitor quality changes and identify adulterated ingredients effectively based on volatile profiles (Medina et al, 2019). However, the accuracy of the method depends on the number of statistical samples in each group.…”
Section: Methods Of Chromatographic Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Food fraud threatens agri‐food businesses, processers, consumers and producers’ global well‐being (Agnoli et al ; Kendall et al ; Nestlé ; NFU Mutual ). Recent food chemistry, spectrometry and molecular biology technology advancements improve food fraud detection, providing some assurances (e.g., Medina et al ; Torreblanca‐Zanca et al ). Yet, food frauds persist.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%