2024
DOI: 10.1007/s11912-024-01508-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current Trends and Challenges of Microbiome Research in Bladder Cancer

Ilaha Isali,
Emma K. Helstrom,
Nicole Uzzo
et al.

Abstract: Purpose of the Review Microbiome research has provided valuable insights into the associations between microbial communities and bladder cancer. However, this field faces significant challenges that hinder the interpretation, generalization, and translation of findings into clinical practice. This review aims to elucidate these challenges and highlight the importance of addressing them for the advancement of microbiome research in bladder cancer. Recent Findings … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this knowledge is crucial to draw conclusions about the role of UM in the onset and development of disease. For example Isali et al (27) recently pointed out that it is difficult to characterize causality in microbiome research of bladder cancer and even with known composition of microbial taxa, these results cannot be readily translated to therapeutic applications. This study aims to uncover the effects of time on the UM composition using repeated sampling of study participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this knowledge is crucial to draw conclusions about the role of UM in the onset and development of disease. For example Isali et al (27) recently pointed out that it is difficult to characterize causality in microbiome research of bladder cancer and even with known composition of microbial taxa, these results cannot be readily translated to therapeutic applications. This study aims to uncover the effects of time on the UM composition using repeated sampling of study participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%