2019
DOI: 10.5755/j01.eie.25.3.23681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current Trends and Advances in Image Quality Assessment

Abstract: Image quality assessment (IQA) is one of the constantly active areas of research in computer vision. Starting from the idea of Universal Image Quality Index (UIQI), followed by well-known Structural Similarity (SSIM) and its numerous extensions and modifications, through Feature Similarity (FSIM) towards combined metrics using the multi-metric fusion approach, the development of image quality assessment is still in progress. Nevertheless, regardless of new databases and the potential use of deep learning metho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Image quality evaluation methods can be broadly divided into two groups: 1) evaluation using a reference image and 2) without using a reference, though reduced-reference methods are available in some applications 12) .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Image quality evaluation methods can be broadly divided into two groups: 1) evaluation using a reference image and 2) without using a reference, though reduced-reference methods are available in some applications 12) .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The learning criterion is MSE, but the use of image quality metrics is better to judge final image conversion. There are many image quality metrics, both objective and perceptual (subjective) [40][41][42].…”
Section: Evaluation Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the rapid growth in computer performance, this area has been gaining popularity. It is essential to evaluate the quality of the image [22] as it affects the reliability of the metrological measurements. In summary of the literature review, several key features can be distinguished among the methods described:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%