Abstract:Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that currently has no cure, but treatments are available to improve PD symptoms and maintain quality of life. In 2020, about 10 million people worldwide were living with PD. In 1970, the United States Food and Drug Administration approved the drug levodopa as a dopamine replacement to manage PD motor symptoms; levodopa-carbidopa combination became commercialized in 1975. After over 50 years of use, levodopa is still the gold standard for PD t… Show more
“…Yet, CNS drug developers practice their craft by adhering to two conflicting beliefs: (a) drugs for CNS disease can be developed, and (b) CNS drug development can take place in the absence of any consideration of the blood-brain barrier. These contradictory beliefs are illustrated by recent reviews of drug development for AD [1202][1203][1204][1205], PD [755,1206], stroke [1207], brain cancer [1208], Huntington's disease [1209], ALS [1210], ataxia [1211], spinal cord injury [1212], traumatic brain injury [1213], or addiction [1214]. In none of these reviews on drug development for specific brain diseases was the BBB even mentioned, so the crucial issue of brain drug delivery was uniformly in absentia in the CNS drug development process.…”
The history of brain drug delivery is reviewed beginning with the first demonstration, in 1914, that a drug for syphilis, salvarsan, did not enter the brain, due to the presence of a blood–brain barrier (BBB). Owing to restricted transport across the BBB, FDA-approved drugs for the CNS have been generally limited to lipid-soluble small molecules. Drugs that do not cross the BBB can be re-engineered for transport on endogenous BBB carrier-mediated transport and receptor-mediated transport systems, which were identified during the 1970s–1980s. By the 1990s, a multitude of brain drug delivery technologies emerged, including trans-cranial delivery, CSF delivery, BBB disruption, lipid carriers, prodrugs, stem cells, exosomes, nanoparticles, gene therapy, and biologics. The advantages and limitations of each of these brain drug delivery technologies are critically reviewed.
“…Yet, CNS drug developers practice their craft by adhering to two conflicting beliefs: (a) drugs for CNS disease can be developed, and (b) CNS drug development can take place in the absence of any consideration of the blood-brain barrier. These contradictory beliefs are illustrated by recent reviews of drug development for AD [1202][1203][1204][1205], PD [755,1206], stroke [1207], brain cancer [1208], Huntington's disease [1209], ALS [1210], ataxia [1211], spinal cord injury [1212], traumatic brain injury [1213], or addiction [1214]. In none of these reviews on drug development for specific brain diseases was the BBB even mentioned, so the crucial issue of brain drug delivery was uniformly in absentia in the CNS drug development process.…”
The history of brain drug delivery is reviewed beginning with the first demonstration, in 1914, that a drug for syphilis, salvarsan, did not enter the brain, due to the presence of a blood–brain barrier (BBB). Owing to restricted transport across the BBB, FDA-approved drugs for the CNS have been generally limited to lipid-soluble small molecules. Drugs that do not cross the BBB can be re-engineered for transport on endogenous BBB carrier-mediated transport and receptor-mediated transport systems, which were identified during the 1970s–1980s. By the 1990s, a multitude of brain drug delivery technologies emerged, including trans-cranial delivery, CSF delivery, BBB disruption, lipid carriers, prodrugs, stem cells, exosomes, nanoparticles, gene therapy, and biologics. The advantages and limitations of each of these brain drug delivery technologies are critically reviewed.
“…In addition, α‐synuclein is a neuronal protein that regulates synaptic vesicle trafficking and neurotransmitter release. A clinical trial showed that treatments that use small molecule α‐synuclein aggregation therapy, monoclonal antibody, or gene therapy could be better than other clinical trials/therapies for the treatment in the future (Prasad & Hung, 2021). Moreover, a real‐life study revealed a continued reduction in motor fluctuations in patients who received 2 years of continuous treatment with apomorphine as an under‐the‐skin infusion (Meira et al., 2021).…”
Section: The Spot Of Parkinson's Diagnosis In the Genetic Eramentioning
Introduction
Parkinson's disease is one of the progressive neurodegenerative diseases from which people suffer for years. The mechanism of this disease is associated with a decrease in the number of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra (SN) while Lewy bodies are still present. As a result, both motor—ridity, tremor, and bradykinesia—and non‐motor symptoms such as anxiety and depression. Nowadays, it is well known that the cause behind Parkinson's disease is mainly environmental changes, genetic susceptibility, and toxins. Unfortunately, there is no cure for the disease but treatments. The replacement of lost neurons, α‐synuclein and apomorphine, is currently being studied for new therapies. This article focuses on history, mechanism, factors causing Parkinson's disease as well as future therapies for the cure of the diseases.
Methodology
Data were collected from medical journals published on PubMed, The Lancet, Cells, and Nature Reviews Neurology databases with a predefined search strategy. All articles considering new therapies for Parkinson's disease were considered.
Results
The pathophysiology of Parkinson's disease is currently reasonably understood. However, there is no definitive cure so all the treatments focus mainly on reducing or limiting the symptoms. Current treatment studies focus on genetics, replacing lost neurons, α‐synuclein and apomorphine.
Conclusion
Parkinson's disease is the most common movement disorder worldwide because of the loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra. Its symptoms include motor dysfunctions such as rigidity, tremor, and bradykinesia and non‐motor dysfunctions such as anxiety and depression. Through genetics, environmental changes and toxins analysis, it is now known that future new therapies are working on replacing lost neurons, α‐synuclein and apomorphine.
“…Gene therapy is a rapidly growing market across the world with over 700 gene therapy clinical trials ongoing as of 2019, seeking to solve a variety of diseases and disorders, such as Parkinson's Disease, 1,2 Cystic Fibrosis 3,4 and various types of cancer 5,6 at the genomic level. Current clinical applications in gene therapy make use of adeno-associated viral vectors (AAVs) due to their unmatched gene delivery efficiency but limitations in max gene size, disputed safety, high cost of production and lack of ease in scalability has drawn the desire for an alternative for gene delivery applications.…”
Gene therapy for neurological disorders has attracted significant interest as a way to reverse or stop various disease pathologies. Typical gene therapies involving the central and peripheral nervous system make...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.