2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00436-015-4518-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current Surveys of the Seroprevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi, Ehrlichia canis, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Leishmania infantum, Babesia canis, Angiostrongylus vasorum and Dirofilaria immitis in Dogs in Bulgaria

Abstract: Canine vector-borne diseases (CVBDs) have increasingly become a focus of interest in recent years. Some of the CVBDs are zoonotic and may therefore also represent a risk for the human population. Different factors are in discussion to explain the expansion of vectors and pathogens into formerly unaffected areas. Knowledge of the prevalence and distribution of CVBDs in Bulgaria is scant overall and most data rely on single case descriptions. The aim of the present study was to determine the seroprevalence of im… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
23
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Results indicate that the tested animals were predominantly infected with Ehrlichia pathogens. In that respect, our results differ from those presented by Pantchev et al, (16). Their team performed tests on 167 dog samples (where dogs exhibited no indication of vector-transferable rickettsiosis) and determined 77 samples positive for A. phagocytophilum, and 35 positive for E. canis.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results indicate that the tested animals were predominantly infected with Ehrlichia pathogens. In that respect, our results differ from those presented by Pantchev et al, (16). Their team performed tests on 167 dog samples (where dogs exhibited no indication of vector-transferable rickettsiosis) and determined 77 samples positive for A. phagocytophilum, and 35 positive for E. canis.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In Bulgaria, the infection with E. canis in dogs was first encountered in 2006, and with A. phagocytophilum in 2008 (13,14), respectively. In the years to follow, numerous studies were submitted that gave evidence to the wide spread of these pathogens in Bulgaria (15,16). Since then, the diagnostic in the small animal clinics has been relying mostly on rapid ELISA tests or on immunochromatographic assays that aim to quickly detect antibodies to these agents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a modification with regard to kit contents, another FITC-conjugated secondary antibody was used at a dilution of 1:1000 (Fluorescein-labeled affinity purified antibody to dog IgG produced in goat from Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories), with Evans Blue (2.5 ml, Bio-Rad) as counter stain and Biognost ® mounting medium (Bios) to cover the wells prior to microscopy. The presence of IgG antibodies against A. phagocytophilum had been tested in 794 samples by a commercial indirect IFAT (MegaScreen FLUOAN-APLASMA phagocytophilum, Diagnostik MegaCor GmbH, Hörbranz, Austria) according to Pantchev et al (2015b Wolf et al (2014). The test cutoff was set at dilutions of >= 1:50.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) and Eastern Europe up to 46·1% (Pantchev et al . ). A. phagocytophilum primarily reproduces in neutrophils in its mammalian hosts, although it can occasionally also be found in eosinophilic granulocytes (Woldehiwet ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%