Anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA) poses an uncertain but increased risk for sudden cardiac arrest (SCA). Balancing this peril with hazards of cardiac surgery remains challenging. 1 Expert guidelines provide recommendations on indications and timing for AAOCA repair. 2 Multiple techniques have been described for repair: unroofing of the intramural segment to relocate the ostium, direct reimplantation of the AAOCA, creation of a neoostium, and even coronary artery bypass grafting. 3 All these techniques aim to provide normal coronary flow at rest and under stress; however, which technique is appropriate for which patient remains unsettled. In this context, the study by Bonilla-Ramirez and colleagues 4 provides insight into technique choice from a group that has taken the lead in the organized approach to patients with AAOCA. The authors prefer unroofing if the intramural course is distal to the commissural pillar of the aortic valve and there is a suitable exit site of the AAOCA from the aortic wall. If these criteria are not met, or if the unroofing has been judged unsatisfactory by the surgeon, the AAOCA is transected and reimplanted (TAR) into the "correct" sinus.Using this tailored approach in 61 consecutive patients over 7 years, the authors report essentially identical and excellent outcomes in patients undergoing unroofing (75%) and TAR (25%). There was "crossover" between the groups, with 6 patients undergoing intraoperative conversion from unroofing to TAR, though this was less common later in the study period. There were no deaths. One