2020
DOI: 10.5194/bg-17-281-2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current, steady-state and historical weathering rates of base cations at two forest sites in northern and southern Sweden: a comparison of three methods

Abstract: Abstract. Reliable and accurate methods for estimating soil mineral weathering rates are required tools in evaluating the sustainability of increased harvesting of forest biomass and assessments of critical loads of acidity. A variety of methods that differ in concept, temporal and spatial scale, and data requirements are available for measuring weathering rates. In this study, causes of discrepancies in weathering rates between methods were analysed and were classified as being either conceptual (inevitable) … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 96 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) current rates from input-output budgets (Drahota et al, 2006;Simonsson et al, 2015); (3) strontium isotope ratios (Åberg, 1995;Perakis et al, 2006); (4) modelling using process-based weathering models like PROFILE (Sverdrup and Warfvinge, 1993;Akselsson et al, 2006) and ( 5) laboratory experimental methods ( de Vries, 1994;Bain and Langan, 1995;van der Salm et al, 1998). Often, large differences in the estimation of the weathering rates between these methods are found with differences up to a factor of 20 (Bain and Langan, 1995;Kolka et al, 1996;Whitfield et al, 2006;Casetou-Gustafson et al, 2020). Because of the huge variability in weathering estimates between these methods I used literature values for the weathering estimation as application of either one of these commonly used methods will not significantly reduce the uncertainty of the nutrient balance, which was the main aim of this thesis.…”
Section: Weatheringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) current rates from input-output budgets (Drahota et al, 2006;Simonsson et al, 2015); (3) strontium isotope ratios (Åberg, 1995;Perakis et al, 2006); (4) modelling using process-based weathering models like PROFILE (Sverdrup and Warfvinge, 1993;Akselsson et al, 2006) and ( 5) laboratory experimental methods ( de Vries, 1994;Bain and Langan, 1995;van der Salm et al, 1998). Often, large differences in the estimation of the weathering rates between these methods are found with differences up to a factor of 20 (Bain and Langan, 1995;Kolka et al, 1996;Whitfield et al, 2006;Casetou-Gustafson et al, 2020). Because of the huge variability in weathering estimates between these methods I used literature values for the weathering estimation as application of either one of these commonly used methods will not significantly reduce the uncertainty of the nutrient balance, which was the main aim of this thesis.…”
Section: Weatheringmentioning
confidence: 99%