2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1387-6473(02)00245-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current status of weak gravitational lensing

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
99
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
4
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where is the distance from the point mass, E is the Einstein radius for the lens, 0 is the distance at which the gravitational acceleration changes from Newtonian to MOND, and out is the distance at which the gravitational acceleration changes back to a À2 law (Mortlock & Turner 2001;Hoekstra et al 2002). Since both E and 0 scale as the square root of the point mass, the resulting shear profile scales linearly with the mass for T 0 and 3 out , as the square root of the mass for 0 TT out , and somewhere between the two extremes for the transitional regions, $ 0 and $ out .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where is the distance from the point mass, E is the Einstein radius for the lens, 0 is the distance at which the gravitational acceleration changes from Newtonian to MOND, and out is the distance at which the gravitational acceleration changes back to a À2 law (Mortlock & Turner 2001;Hoekstra et al 2002). Since both E and 0 scale as the square root of the point mass, the resulting shear profile scales linearly with the mass for T 0 and 3 out , as the square root of the mass for 0 TT out , and somewhere between the two extremes for the transitional regions, $ 0 and $ out .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This idea of modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND) has been used to reproduce the observed rotation velocities of spiral galaxies without inclusion of any dark matter (e.g., McGaugh & de Blok 1998) and could also explain the observed velocity dispersions and X-ray temperatures of clusters without needing any additional matter beyond the observed baryons and a small neutrino mass (Sanders 2003). Several arguments against MOND have been made using gravitational lensing observations of galaxies and clusters (Gavazzi 2002;Hoekstra, Yee, & Gladders 2002;Mortlock & Turner 2001), but because of the lack of a general relativistic theory giving the strength of the interaction between light and gravity in the MOND regime, these observations can be explained by alterations in the MOND formalism (Sanders & McGaugh 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thanks to velocity dispersion techniques, it now appears that spiral galaxies are associated with dark halos which extend out to 200 kPc from the galactic centre, which is well beyond all of the visible matter. Other techniques have also been developed, and gravitational lensing experiments have made observations which cannot be accounted for by the visible matter content [19].…”
Section: Galactic Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cosmic shear experiments may be broadly divided into two categories (for useful reviews see Hoekstra, Yee, & Gladders 2002;Refregier 2003 Bacon et al 2003). In 10-15 years, cosmic shear surveys will cover the whole sky and will have the power to characterize the properties of the dark energy and matter as a function of redshift.…”
Section: Cosmic Shearmentioning
confidence: 99%