Current Status of the Utilization of Powered Wheelchair in Preschool Children with Locomotive Disability in Japan

Abstract

ABSTRACT. [Purpose]This study aimed to elucidate the actual state of powered wheelchair (PWC) prescription for preschool children with disabilities in Japan, and also to determine the approximate number of preschool children with disabilities who would potentially benefit from PWC use. [Subjects and Methods] A total of 318 facilities providing rehabilitation for disabled children in Japan were enrolled in the study. A questionnaire about PWC use for preschoolers was mailed to the facilities. Each study items were analyzed employing the Fisher's exact test.[Results] Of the 318 facilities, consent to participate in this study was obtained from 108 (return rate: 34.0%). After PWC provision, many facilities reported improvement in quality of life indices for preschool children with disabilities. It was revealed that there were 6 preschool children from 2 to 6 years of age with disabilities who might acquire a means of independent locomotion through PWC provision and thereby experience improved quality of life. [Conclusion] There was no negative comment from the facilities studied about the prescription and provision of PWC for preschool children with disabilities.

Powered mobility interventions for very young children with mobility limitations to aid participation and positive development: the EMPoWER evidence synthesis

“…. limit 6 to ("newborn infant (birth to 1 month)" or "infant (1 to 23 months)" or "preschool child (2 to 5 years)" or "child (6 to 12 years)" or "adolescent (13 to 18 years)" or "young adult (19 to 24 years)" 12 Jone et al, 13 Jones et al, 14 Tefft et al, 15 Huang et al, 17 Bottos et al, 23 Bamer et al, 55 Galloway et al, 57 Pritchard-Wiart et al, 58 Evans et al, 59 Feldner et al, 60 Kenyon et al, 61 Evans and Baines, 62 Furumasu et al, 81 Logan et al, 87 Butler, 89 Cooper et al, 168 Huang and Galloway, 169 Kornafel et al, 104 Logan et al, 90,118 Mockler et al, 111 Odor and Watson, 91 Pope et al, 125 Smania et al, 123 Stokes et al, 92 Uyama and Hanaki, 112 Zazula and Foulds, 119 Durkin, 109 Gudgeon and Kirk, 99 Pituch et al, 100 Sonday and Gretschel, 101 Wiart et al, 102 Currier et al, 105 Feldner, 116 Home and Ham, 106 Huhn et al, 130 Kakimoto et al, 107 Lovett, 113 Omori et al, 114 Schoepflin et al, 128 Weinstein et al, 93 Larin et al,…”