2014
DOI: 10.4161/org.29245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current status of the organ replacement approach for malignancies and an overture for organ bioengineering and regenerative medicine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 152 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the Milan criteria has been modified by many transplant societies to determine whether other patients with HCC can be eligible for LT with an acceptable survival rate of 5 years after transplantation ( Figure 2 ). These efforts expanded the Milan criteria, which depend on the strict tumor size and number of nodules to determine an HCC patient’s eligibility for LT, to depend on overall tumor size and number of nodules as well as different tumor markers such as AFP [ 7 ]. This expansion of the criteria has polarized into the classifications of University of California San Francisco (UCSF) and beyond UCSF [ 8 ].…”
Section: Concept and History Of Transplant Oncologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the Milan criteria has been modified by many transplant societies to determine whether other patients with HCC can be eligible for LT with an acceptable survival rate of 5 years after transplantation ( Figure 2 ). These efforts expanded the Milan criteria, which depend on the strict tumor size and number of nodules to determine an HCC patient’s eligibility for LT, to depend on overall tumor size and number of nodules as well as different tumor markers such as AFP [ 7 ]. This expansion of the criteria has polarized into the classifications of University of California San Francisco (UCSF) and beyond UCSF [ 8 ].…”
Section: Concept and History Of Transplant Oncologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LT for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICCA) has been contraindicated in most centers based on the poor results reported in the late 1980s and early 20 0 0s. 1,2 The main caveat with those studies was the relatively small number of patients, the combined analysis of patients with PhCCA and ICCA, and the inclusion of cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients. Sapisochin et al 19 demonstrated in a multicenter, retrospective study conducted in Spain and validated in an international study 20 that LT for "very early" ICCA (single tumor and up to 2 cm) in cirrhotic patients achieved excellent 5-year overall survival and recurrence rates (73% and 0% in the Spanish cohort and 65% and 18% in the international cohort).…”
Section: Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40 The true value of these "extreme" resections has yet to be defined and these procedures should only be considered for highly selected patients in a combined transplant and oncology program after an extensive, multidisciplinary discussion. 1,41…”
Section: Transplant Oncology Extends the Limit Of Cancer Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the last decade, the transplant oncology field has been evolving and advances in locoregional and systemic therapies including immunotherapy have provided additional options for further exploration of neoadjuvant and adjuvant strategies to improve HCC resection rates [ 6 , 7 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ]. We report an interesting case of a patient with HCC who developed pseudo-progression followed by an excellent response with significant downstaging after neoadjuvant treatment with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%