2010
DOI: 10.1080/19475705.2010.486933
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current status of seismo-electromagnetics for short-term earthquake prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
62
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
62
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a question debated in the science community (Eftaxias, 2012). Despite fairly abundant evidence, EM precursors have not been adequately accepted as real physical quantities (Morgounov and Shakhraman'yan, 1996;Uyeda et al, 2009;Hayakawa and Hobara, 2010). There may be legitimate reasons for the critical views concerning the reliability of EM precursors: the degree to which we can predict a phenomenon is often measured by how well we understand it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is a question debated in the science community (Eftaxias, 2012). Despite fairly abundant evidence, EM precursors have not been adequately accepted as real physical quantities (Morgounov and Shakhraman'yan, 1996;Uyeda et al, 2009;Hayakawa and Hobara, 2010). There may be legitimate reasons for the critical views concerning the reliability of EM precursors: the degree to which we can predict a phenomenon is often measured by how well we understand it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, improvements in the MHz-kHz EME technique have permitted a real-time monitoring of the fracture process (Fukui et al, 2005;Kumar and Misra, 2007;Chauhan and Ashok Misra, 2008;Baddari et al, 1999Baddari et al, , 2011Baddari and Frolov, 2010;Lacidogna et al, 2010;Schiavi et al, 2011;Carpinteri et al, 2012). However, the MHz-kHz electromagnetic (EM) precursors are detectable not only at the laboratory but also at the geological scale; a stressed rock behaves like a stress-EM transducer (Sadovski, 1982;Hayakawa and Fujinawa, 1994;Gokhberg et al, 1995;Hayakawa, 1999Hayakawa, , 2009Hayakawa and Molchanov, 2002;Eftaxias et al, 2007Eftaxias et al, , 2011Eftaxias, 2012;Molchanov and Hayakawa, 2008). The idea that the fracture-induced MHz-kHz EM fields should also permit the monitoring of the gradual damage of stressed materials in the Earth's crust, as happens in the laboratory experiments, in real time and step by step, seems to be justified: the aspect of self-affine nature of faulting and fracture is well documented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been recently shown that there exist electromagnetic precursors to earthquakes (EQs) (e.g., Hayakawa 1999Hayakawa , 2009aHayakawa and Molchanov 2002;Pulinets and Boyarchuk 2004;Molchanov and Hayakawa 2008;Uyeda et al 2009;Hayakawa and Hobara 2010). The observation of seismo-electromagnetic and related phenomena can be customarily classified into the two categories: (1) direct effects emitted from the lithosphere and received on the Earth's surface, and (2) the indirect effects of EQs which are the perturbations (or disturbances) taking place either in the atmosphere or in the ionosphere due to pre-EQ lithospheric activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, anomalous changes to the ground, atmosphere and ionosphere, observed by both Earth-and space-based instrumentation, were found to be associated with several earthquakes that occurred in China, Taiwan, Europe and Japan (Walia et al 2006, Yasuoka et al 2006, Cioni et al 2007, Omori et al 2007, Sharma et al 2008, Anagnostopoulos et al 2010b, Hayakawa and Hobara 2010, Singh et al 2010a. These recent reported pronounced changes in the various surface and atmospheric parameters a few days prior to various earthquakes provide a strong evidence of lithosphere-atmosphere-ionosphere coupling.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%