2017
DOI: 10.14366/usg.17018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current status of core needle biopsy of the thyroid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, we used relatively small sample size to assess the low incidence of complication of FNA and CNB. Although CNB has been known as a safe procedure [ 42 43 44 ], a further prospective investigation with a larger sample size is necessary to verify the results of our study. Finally, we performed local anesthesia with 2% lidocaine when performing the CNB procedure, but not with FNA procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Third, we used relatively small sample size to assess the low incidence of complication of FNA and CNB. Although CNB has been known as a safe procedure [ 42 43 44 ], a further prospective investigation with a larger sample size is necessary to verify the results of our study. Finally, we performed local anesthesia with 2% lidocaine when performing the CNB procedure, but not with FNA procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…However, due to its substantial rate of nondiagnostic and indeterminate results, various methods to enhance its diagnostic yield have been suggested [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. Core-needle biopsy (CNB) has emerged as a diagnostic tool for thyroid nodules based on recent advances in core biopsy devices (spring-activated single-or double-action needles) and the widespread use of highresolution ultrasonography (US) [8,9]. CNB has been reported to be an effective and safe diagnostic tool, as it allows clinicians to obtain a core tissue sample with potential information on architectural histological structures, thus enabling immunochemical staining [10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…b Choking and coughing appeared in two patients, and disappeared in 24 h and 7 d, respectively, without any treatment. c All of patients recovered within 3 h. [9] 2011 Korea 10 1 a þ Park et al [25] 2011 Korea 11 1 þ Guenette et al [11] 2013 Ireland 14 1 b þ Lee et al [24] 2014 Korea 32 6 a þ Wang et al [52] 2015 China 8 þ Lim et al [13] 2015 Korea 39 3 a þ Kim et al [12] 2015 Korea 27 1 a þ Long et al [58] 2015 China 12 -1 5 Kim et al [59] 2016 Korea 129 5 a 3 1 1 1 2 Guang et al [68] 2017 China 33 1 Total --339 19 3 3 1 [8] 2007 1 (5 d) Self-limited pain Lewis et al [7] 2002 0 Heilo et al [5] 2011 10% Hay et al [4] 2013 1 100% a Self-limited neck swelling and regional discomfort were reported in all 16 patients and resolved within 1-2 weeks.…”
Section: Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…During the follow-up period, the indications for repeated RFA or EA include the presence of power Doppler signals or enhancing portion on a CT scan, despite a reduction in the size [5,6,9,13]; volume reduction <50% [8]; or the presence of residual cancer tissue on core-needle biopsy or fine-needle aspiration cytology [5,8,10,51,52]. An additional treatment may be required for large cancers.…”
Section: Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%