2022
DOI: 10.1111/coin.12564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current status, application, and challenges of the interpretability of generative adversarial network models

Abstract: The generative adversarial network (GAN) is one of the most promising methods in the field of unsupervised learning. Model developers, users, and other interested people are highly concerned about the GAN mechanism where the generative model and the discriminative model learn from each other in a gameplay manner, which generates a causal relationship among output features, internal network structure, feature extraction process, and output results. Through the study of the interpretability of GANs, the validity… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 52 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, Ref. [55] discussed the interpretability issues of GAN models, stressing the necessity for feature-selection techniques that are capable of adapting to the fluidity of malware features. Collectively, these studies draw attention to the limitations of standard feature-selection approaches when combined with GAN frameworks, accentuating the demand for more flexible and evolving feature-selection methods in the realm of malware detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Ref. [55] discussed the interpretability issues of GAN models, stressing the necessity for feature-selection techniques that are capable of adapting to the fluidity of malware features. Collectively, these studies draw attention to the limitations of standard feature-selection approaches when combined with GAN frameworks, accentuating the demand for more flexible and evolving feature-selection methods in the realm of malware detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%