2014
DOI: 10.1117/12.2056389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current status and future plans for the Maunakea Spectroscopic Explorer (MSE)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The three maps we use are generated from mock surveys with average sightline spacings of d ⊥ = 2.5, 4, and 6 h −1 Mpc. The smallest sightline separation configuration is similar to the ongoing CLAMATO survey, and the larger separation configurations are similar to what we expect from large-area surveys on 8 -10 m telescopes like the Subaru Prime Focus Spectrograph (PFS; Takada et al 2014) or the Maunakea Spectroscopic Explorer (Simons et al 2014). We refer to these tomographic maps as the hires, midres, and lores flux maps.…”
Section: Finding Voids In Fluxsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The three maps we use are generated from mock surveys with average sightline spacings of d ⊥ = 2.5, 4, and 6 h −1 Mpc. The smallest sightline separation configuration is similar to the ongoing CLAMATO survey, and the larger separation configurations are similar to what we expect from large-area surveys on 8 -10 m telescopes like the Subaru Prime Focus Spectrograph (PFS; Takada et al 2014) or the Maunakea Spectroscopic Explorer (Simons et al 2014). We refer to these tomographic maps as the hires, midres, and lores flux maps.…”
Section: Finding Voids In Fluxsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…We will primarily focus on three future facilities: the 4-metre Multi-Object Spectroscopic Telescope (4MOST;de Jong et al 2012), the Subaru Prime Focus Spectrograph (PFS; Sugai et al 2012;Takada et al 2014), and the Maunakea Spectroscopic Explorer (MSE; Simons et al 2014;McConnachie et al 2014). Numerous other facilities, both in existence and planned for future construction, have MOS capability and will conduct MOS surveys in the LSST era (see McConnachie et al 2014, for a summary).…”
Section: Insights For Future Mos Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model for MOS surveys is being pioneered by the OzDES survey (Yuan et al 2015), which is obtaining spectra and redshifts for the Dark Energy Survey (DES; Flaugher 2005). Such a strategy will become standard for future facilities with large, rapidly reconfigurable fiber positioners, such as 4MOST (de Jong et al 2012), the Subaru Prime Focus Spectrograph (PFS; Sugai et al 2012;Takada et al 2014), the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (Aghamousa et al 2016), and the Mauna Kea Spectroscopic Explorer (MSE; Simons et al 2014;McConnachie et al 2014), all of which will conduct numerous parallel spectroscopic programs including some related to dynamic targets discovered by LSST (Tyson 2002;LSST Science Collaboration et al 2009a). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current design stretches the current manufacturing technologies especially for the disperser and aspherical lenses. In the ongoing design phase, we intend to address the some follow-up issues: (1) The science group to evaluate the scientific impact with lower spectral resolution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Maunakea Spectroscopic Explorer (MSE) project will transform the CFHT 3.6m optical telescope to a 10m class dedicated multi-object spectroscopic facility, with an ability to simultaneously measure thousands of objects with three spectral resolution modes respectively low resolution of R≈3,000, moderate resolution of R≈6,000 and high resolution of R≈40,000 [1] [2]. Two identical multi-object high resolution spectrographs (HR) are expected to simultaneously produce 1084 spectrum with high resolution of 40,000 at Blue (401-416nm) and Green (472-489nm) channels, and 20,000 at Red (626-674nm) channel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%