1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4679(199907)55:7<781::aid-jclp1>3.0.co;2-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current status and future directions of psychological assessment: Introduction

Abstract: This article introduces the major themes and context for the special series on the current status and future directions of psychological assessment. The internal and external challenges to assessment are outlined along with a listing of professional publications responding to these challenges. Each of the articles in the Special Series is introduced and includes topics on the current status of assessment, survival strategies, financial efficacy, and treatment planning.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
125
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
5
125
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This will be most successfully achieved when the clinician can demonstrate that conducting assessments for treatment-planning purposes significantly enhances diagnostic accuracy and/or reduces the cost or length of treatment. These suggestions are consistent with recent recommendations from APA (Meyer et al, 1998) and other researchers in the field (Groth-Marnat, 1999;Stout, 1997). It is thus encouraging that the majority of respondents in this sample reported incorporating formal assessment measures in the evaluation of treatment outcome for their clients at some level.…”
Section: Conclusion and Implications For Clinical Practicesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This will be most successfully achieved when the clinician can demonstrate that conducting assessments for treatment-planning purposes significantly enhances diagnostic accuracy and/or reduces the cost or length of treatment. These suggestions are consistent with recent recommendations from APA (Meyer et al, 1998) and other researchers in the field (Groth-Marnat, 1999;Stout, 1997). It is thus encouraging that the majority of respondents in this sample reported incorporating formal assessment measures in the evaluation of treatment outcome for their clients at some level.…”
Section: Conclusion and Implications For Clinical Practicesupporting
confidence: 91%
“… 36 Internal consistency of the BDI ranges from 0.73 to 0.92 with a mean of 0.86. 36 , 37 In addition, the BDI demonstrates high internal consistency values of 0.86 and 0.81 for the psychiatric and nonpsychiatric population, respectively. 36 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, unlike many clinical activities, personality assessment is a uniquely psychological endeavor. As Groth-Marnat (1999) pointed out, there are at least 35 different categories of mental health professionals who treat mental disorders, but only psychologists are trained and qualified to conduct personality assessments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%