2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.07.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current status and future developments of contrast-enhanced ultrasound of carotid atherosclerosis

Abstract: B-mode and Doppler ultrasound are commonly used for the evaluation of atherosclerosis in the carotid arteries. Recently, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has been introduced as a technique to improve the detection of carotid atherosclerosis and evaluate the presence of intraplaque neovascularization, which is considered a marker of plaque vulnerability. The present review focuses on the role of CEUS for the assessment of atherosclerosis and plaque instability. Currently available literature and future devel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
53
0
25

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(66 reference statements)
2
53
0
25
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we compared neuropsychological RAVLT score before CAS and at 1-month follow-up. We found a direct association between plaque enhancement and postprocedural microembolization, which is consistent with our previous findings on plaque vulnerability and with published data [5,6]. In detail, patients with a SI max value of more than 26 have a significantly higher risk of developing cerebral microembolization with CAS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, we compared neuropsychological RAVLT score before CAS and at 1-month follow-up. We found a direct association between plaque enhancement and postprocedural microembolization, which is consistent with our previous findings on plaque vulnerability and with published data [5,6]. In detail, patients with a SI max value of more than 26 have a significantly higher risk of developing cerebral microembolization with CAS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…There is a growing body of evidence that CEUS evaluation of carotid artery lesions can be a cost-effective and reliable method to define plaque vulnerability and predict the risk of embolization [5,6,11]. Because of the significantly higher risk of periprocedural embolization during primary CAS as compared with carotid endoarterectomy, CEUS can be advantageously applied as a useful imaging system for Table 2 Results of the study between patients who developed post procedural cerebral ischemic injury (Microembolization+) and those without post-procedural ischemic injury (Microembolization−) * p value <0.05.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Vasa vasorum-derived plaque neovascularization and inflammation are considered the main causes of atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability and rupture (11,15,26). Previous studies have shown that the amount of intraplaque contrast enhancement correlated with the presence and the extent of intraplaque neovascularization and with the degree of inflammation on histologic examination of the plaque after endarterectomy (13,26). Therefore, CEUS permitting direct visualization of parietal vasa vasorum and quantifying carotid wall vascularization may represent a valuable tool for detecting inflammation in carotid arteries of patients with LVV and may also provide a nonivasive technique to monitor therapeutic interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carotid contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) can offer some information about the presence of neovascularization [73] in particular when microbubbles are used [74,75]. However, the reproducibility and utility of this modality for clinical care are not well established [76].…”
Section: The Plaque Neovascularizationmentioning
confidence: 99%