2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current status and environment impact of direct straw return in China’s cropland – A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
124
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 299 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
4
124
0
Order By: Relevance
“…XRD spectrogram before and after modifications is shown in Figure 3. e XRD spectrum is fitted by MDI Jade 5.0 software, and CI is calculated according to formula (2). CI obtained is shown in Figure 4 [28][29][30].…”
Section: Effect Of Modification Methods On Crystallinity Of Wsfsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…XRD spectrogram before and after modifications is shown in Figure 3. e XRD spectrum is fitted by MDI Jade 5.0 software, and CI is calculated according to formula (2). CI obtained is shown in Figure 4 [28][29][30].…”
Section: Effect Of Modification Methods On Crystallinity Of Wsfsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e annual output of straw around the world has surpassed 2.9 billion tons. Of the 2.9 billion tons, 66% is returned directly to the field or incinerated as living energy, 19% for building materials or vegetable production covering materials, 12% as forage for herbivorous livestock, and 3% as raw materials for handicraft making [1][2][3]. Waste straw is a pollutant and contributor to climate change.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the disadvantages of returning straw to the field is incomplete decomposing of straw due to insufficient time for biodegradation, consequently hindering root penetration. Furthermore, crop pest infestation may be aggravated by straws which provide favorable living places [18]. Another negative impact of a straw return to the soil is increasing GHG emissions.…”
Section: Benefits and Disadvantages Of Returning Straw To Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to statistics, the output of straw in the world is more than 2.9 billion tons every year, including 21% wheat straw, 19% rice straw, 10% barley straw, 35% corn straw, 2% rye straw, 3% oat straw, 5% cereal straw, and 5% sorghum straw. 66% of the world's crop straw is returned directly to the field or burned as live energy, 19% is used as building materials or covering materials in vegetable production, 12% as forage for herbivorous livestock, and about 3% as raw materials for handicrafts [16][17][18]. China is a big agricultural country, which grows a large amount of crops every year, thus producing abundant agricultural waste.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%