2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccep.2019.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current State of Surgical Left Atrial Appendage Exclusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Devices for RF ablation of the atrial wall have made the maze procedure faster, easier, and more widespread. However, the clinical outcome of the RF modification of the operation is worse than the outcome of the classic maze procedure [ 15 , 16 ] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Devices for RF ablation of the atrial wall have made the maze procedure faster, easier, and more widespread. However, the clinical outcome of the RF modification of the operation is worse than the outcome of the classic maze procedure [ 15 , 16 ] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incomplete occlusion may be more dangerous than no intervention; the same study found thrombus in 41% unsuccessfully excluded appendages, with restricted flow through a narrowed neck likely predisposing to stasis and thromboembolism [16]. External clip devices (Atriclip, AtriCure, West Chester, OH) may have a success rate as high as 98%, inducing appendage tissue necrosis and mimicking excision [17]. The ATLAS trial (AtriClip LAA Exclusion Concomitant to Structural Heart Procedures, NCT02701062) currently underway seeks to randomize 2000 patients with history of AF undergoing CABG or valve surgery to AtriClip vs. medical management (anticoagulation).…”
Section: Key Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%