Measuring Well-Being 2021
DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197512531.003.0018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current Recommendations on the Selection of Measures for Well-Being

Abstract: Measures of well-being have proliferated over the past decades. Very little guidance has been available about which measures to use in particular contexts. This chapter provides a series of recommendations, based on the present state of knowledge and the existing measures available, of which measures might be preferred in which contexts. The recommendations came out of an interdisciplinary workshop on the measurement of well-being and are shaped around the number of items that can be included in a survey and a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Drawing on prior theory and empirical work, we identified seven facets of PWB (positive affect, optimism, purpose in life, life satisfaction, personal growth, mastery, and pleasant experiences) likely to be relevant for health over the life course (Boehm & Kubzansky, 2012;Trudel-Fitzgerald et al, 2019;VanderWeele et al, 2020). Given that word use can parallel emotional experience and relates to health and well-being (Vine et al, 2020), we used the essays written by 11-year-old participants about their future to assess facets of PWB (Heyman et al, 2014;Lee & Peterson, 1997).…”
Section: Pwbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing on prior theory and empirical work, we identified seven facets of PWB (positive affect, optimism, purpose in life, life satisfaction, personal growth, mastery, and pleasant experiences) likely to be relevant for health over the life course (Boehm & Kubzansky, 2012;Trudel-Fitzgerald et al, 2019;VanderWeele et al, 2020). Given that word use can parallel emotional experience and relates to health and well-being (Vine et al, 2020), we used the essays written by 11-year-old participants about their future to assess facets of PWB (Heyman et al, 2014;Lee & Peterson, 1997).…”
Section: Pwbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measures are highly subjective in that respondents must draw on their own individual views of what is important in life to judge how their life measures up. This ability to incorporate a wide range of views on what is important in life is a key reason for some researchers to view life satisfaction as the most important measure of subjective wellbeing [14]. Individual life satisfaction items have demonstrated consistently high correlations with a broad range of much more complex measures of wellbeing, including objective measures [4,[14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: What Is Life Satisfaction?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Для сбора данных применялись: методика «Стиль саморегуляции поведения - ССМП 2020» (Моросанова, Клондратюк, 2020); Методика диагностики структуры социальных установок (Айзенк, Вильсон, 2000); Опросник межличностных отношений (Фетискин и др., 2002); Шкала привлекательности российских партий и общественно-политических организаций, оценка интенсивности социальных контактов и участия в досуговых, клубных, волонтерских мероприятиях, неформальных объединениях и спонтанных событиях. Для оценки показателей благополучия и удовлетворенности жизнью задействовалась Британская шкала благополучия (ответы на вопросы «Насколько Вы удовлетворены Вашей жизнью в целом за последнее время?», «По Вашим ощущениям, насколько важно то, что Вы делаете в жизни?», «В целом, насколько счастливым Вы себя чувствовали вчера?», «В целом, насколько сильно вчера Вы испытывали чувство тревоги?» (Vander Weele et al, 2021).…”
Section: методы исследованияunclassified