1979
DOI: 10.1056/nejm197903153001103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current Practice of Artificial Insemination by Donor in the United States

Abstract: Of 711 physicians likely to perform artificial insemination by donor surveyed to determine their current practices, 471 responded, of whom 379 reported that they performed this procedure. They accounted for approximately 3576 births by this means in 1977. In addition to treating infertility, 26 per cent of these physicians used the procedure to prevent transmission of a genetic disease, and 10 per cent used if for single women. Donors of semen were primarily from universities, were only superficially screened … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it would appear that relationship status -single or partnered -does not explain the difference in responses. It could be the socio-political norms surrounding the use of donor conception at the time of first conception that are likely to influence the perspectives and opinions of these mothers (Curie-Cohen et al, 1979;Daniels and Golden, 2004;Shapiro et al, 1990). Since respondents in a heterosexual relationship were generally older at the time they responded to the survey it seems reasonable to suggest that they first used donor spermatozoa at a time when donor conception was mainly available to women in a heterosexual relationship, when the use of anonymous donors was usual practice, when secrecy and non-disclosure was encouraged, when all aspects of the process were controlled by medical practitioners and when there was no option to access donor information and/or to be offered a choice of donor (Cahn, 2008;Sylvester and Burt, 2007).…”
Section: Similarities and Differences Between The Cohortsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it would appear that relationship status -single or partnered -does not explain the difference in responses. It could be the socio-political norms surrounding the use of donor conception at the time of first conception that are likely to influence the perspectives and opinions of these mothers (Curie-Cohen et al, 1979;Daniels and Golden, 2004;Shapiro et al, 1990). Since respondents in a heterosexual relationship were generally older at the time they responded to the survey it seems reasonable to suggest that they first used donor spermatozoa at a time when donor conception was mainly available to women in a heterosexual relationship, when the use of anonymous donors was usual practice, when secrecy and non-disclosure was encouraged, when all aspects of the process were controlled by medical practitioners and when there was no option to access donor information and/or to be offered a choice of donor (Cahn, 2008;Sylvester and Burt, 2007).…”
Section: Similarities and Differences Between The Cohortsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also made the assumption that the sperm donor was a physician who had an average number of f ¼ 3.3 natural children (1977 figure) and an average number of n ¼ 3.9 DI children. This figure of 3.9 was as reported by 270 of the 379 physicians performing DI in 1971 (17). These numbers were used to determine m, which is the average number of potential half-sibling matings per donor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In 1979, University of Wisconsin researchers Curie-Cohen et al published one of the classic articles on donor insemination [ 5 ]. Approximately 400 physicians reported that in addition to treating infertility, 26 % used DI to prevent transmission of a genetic disease and 10 % used DI for single women.…”
Section: Historymentioning
confidence: 99%