2007
DOI: 10.3310/hta11320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current practice, accuracy, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the school entry hearing screen

Abstract: Non-UK purchasers will have to pay a small fee for post and packing. For European countries the cost is £2 per monograph and for the rest of the world £3 per monograph.You can order HTA monographs from our Despatch Agents:-fax (with credit card or official purchase order) -post (with credit card or official purchase order or cheque) -phone during office hours (credit card only).Additionally the HTA website allows you either to pay securely by credit card or to print out your order and then post or fax it. NHS … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
153
2
18

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
7
153
2
18
Order By: Relevance
“…Noise interference is recognized as one of the most important contributors to over-referrals and the subsequent ineffi ciency of hearing screening programs for children ( Bamford et al, 2007 ;FitzZaland & Zink, 1984 ;AAA, 2011 ;ASHA, 1997 ;Lo & McPherson, 2013 ). Current recommendations to ensure compliant noise levels include determining ambient noise levels in the test environment prior to testing, using a sound level meter ( AAA, 2011 ; ASHA, 1997 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noise interference is recognized as one of the most important contributors to over-referrals and the subsequent ineffi ciency of hearing screening programs for children ( Bamford et al, 2007 ;FitzZaland & Zink, 1984 ;AAA, 2011 ;ASHA, 1997 ;Lo & McPherson, 2013 ). Current recommendations to ensure compliant noise levels include determining ambient noise levels in the test environment prior to testing, using a sound level meter ( AAA, 2011 ; ASHA, 1997 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al, 2007;Tesch Römer, 1996). In developed countries such as the United Kingdom close to 20% of permanent moderate or greater bilateral, mild bilateral and unilateral impairments remain to be unidentified around the time of school entry (Bamford et al, 2007). In developing countries where there are no systematic newborn hearing screening programmes this proportion is likely much higher (Swanepoel et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In developing countries where there are no systematic newborn hearing screening programmes this proportion is likely much higher (Swanepoel et al, 2010). School entry hearing screening is therefore often the first point of access to hearing screening for most children (Bamford et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most widely preferred and considered the gold standard hearing screening in 4-6 year old children is still the pure tone audiometric sweep test [8][9][10][11][12][13]. In limited-resource countries, implementing this method as a national coverage can be a challenge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many strategies were attempted to make the preschool or school-age hearing screening be feasible, fast, accurate, and cost-effectiveness, however so far they still have not managed to meet the target goal [7][8][9][10][11][12]. The most widely preferred and considered the gold standard hearing screening in 4-6 year old children is still the pure tone audiometric sweep test [8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%