2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11027-018-9829-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current perspectives on nuclear energy as a global climate change mitigation option

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, Jensen-Eriksen (2020) remarked that businesses offered fifth reactors project proposal as green energy resources after Finland government rejected. With regard of these, Siqueira et al (2019) studied that time and management of construction, reactor technology, energy policies, public opinion, life cycle and cost management are main consideration in order to achieve nuclear power projects, provide electricity generation security and get quick response return. Also, Gozgor and Demir said that nuclear power returns were not given quick response.…”
Section: Significant Issues Of Nuclear Energy Investmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, Jensen-Eriksen (2020) remarked that businesses offered fifth reactors project proposal as green energy resources after Finland government rejected. With regard of these, Siqueira et al (2019) studied that time and management of construction, reactor technology, energy policies, public opinion, life cycle and cost management are main consideration in order to achieve nuclear power projects, provide electricity generation security and get quick response return. Also, Gozgor and Demir said that nuclear power returns were not given quick response.…”
Section: Significant Issues Of Nuclear Energy Investmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Natural gas was set to account for half of this needed power, and renewable energy for about 6-7% [74], while coal was deemed unfeasible because of its relative inefficiency and environmental impact [75]. Nuclear electrical power, however, emerged as an environmentally promising and commercially competitive option that could significantly contribute to the UAE's economy and long-term energy security needs [41,76]. This latter realization led to the initiation of a nuclear power program in the UAE, with a selected plant site at "Barakah", and the creation of a regulatory framework to oversee the nation's nuclear industry [77].…”
Section: Historical Context Of the Uaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Defined as "Earth's underpinning natural systems that provide the essential life sustaining ecosystem services such as food, fuel, water, and shelter, on which the human civilization depends" [40], the biosphere (with its three constituent parts-the atmosphere, the hydrosphere, and the lithosphere) is directly impacted by the adoption of NPT as part of a national energy mix. One commonly used key indicator of this impact is the greenhouse gas contribution of nuclear energy, which is estimated to average 66 gCO2e/kwh [41]. For example, in evaluating the avoided CO 2 emissions and lives saved from lower greenhouse gas emissions, Kharecha et al [42] reported that nuclear energy generation historically saved over a million lives from fossil-fuels-based air pollution, and could save even more lives by the middle of the century.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it is important to provide the regulatory and promotional measures on how to mitigate the emissions of GHG from the energy sector. Although some countries adopted nuclear power as a strategic option to mitigate GHG emissions [6], this low-carbon energy faces greatly political and socioeconomic controversies in Taiwan mainly due to the natural hazards (e.g., earthquake) and radioactive waste disposal [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%