2016
DOI: 10.1111/jop.12458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current management of the neck in salivary gland carcinomas

Abstract: Salivary gland cancers include a diverse group of tumours with many histological subtypes which occur in both major and minor salivary glands. As a result of this heterogeneity and different sites of presentation, there have been no randomised controlled trials to evaluate the indications and efficacy of neck treatments by either surgery or radiotherapy for occult or apparent neck node metastases. Neck dissection is an important treatment strategy for neck metastases arising from major and minor salivary gland… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Guidelines for the management of salivary gland tumours agree on neck management in the setting of clinically or radiologically positive cervical nodes, with either lymph node dissection or radical radiotherapy if the patient declines or is unfit 4,5 . However, indications for elective treatment of the neck in clinically node‐negative (cN0) patients remains a controversial topic with some advocating elective neck dissection (END), 6 others supporting elective neck irradiation (ENI), and some proposing observation of the cervical lymph nodes 7 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guidelines for the management of salivary gland tumours agree on neck management in the setting of clinically or radiologically positive cervical nodes, with either lymph node dissection or radical radiotherapy if the patient declines or is unfit 4,5 . However, indications for elective treatment of the neck in clinically node‐negative (cN0) patients remains a controversial topic with some advocating elective neck dissection (END), 6 others supporting elective neck irradiation (ENI), and some proposing observation of the cervical lymph nodes 7 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reviews carried out by Wang et al and Green et al [13, 14] attempted to identify the specific features of SGC, which could indicate the need for END. Among the reviewed studies, the two most common indicators for END were high-grade disease and locally advanced disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the reviewed studies, the two most common indicators for END were high-grade disease and locally advanced disease. Other studies suggest that the primary tumour site is also a key factor, with some authors mentioned in the review by Green et al stating that all patients with SGC – except for those with oral cavity tumours – should undergo prophylactic neck dissection [14]. The optimal management of these tumours remains controversial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A majority of salivary gland tumors occurs in the parotid or submandibular glands facilitating pretreatment cytologic evaluation by palpation‐ or ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) 2‐15 . The results of FNA interpretation can have significant implications for the clinical and surgical management of salivary gland lesions 6,16‐25 . Reactive and inflammatory conditions (eg, chronic sialadenitis, lymphoepithelial sialadenitis) are typically managed by clinical observation or treated medically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Benign neoplasms such as Warthin tumor and pleomorphic adenoma are either excised by a conservative surgical approach or, in some cases, patients may opt for close clinical monitoring that may include occasional sampling by FNA. Low‐grade SGCs are usually treated with conservative resection with negative margins, while high‐grade SGCs are often managed by a more radical resection 16,18,22‐25 that may include neck dissection 16,19,23‐28 and facial nerve sacrifice pre‐ or intraoperatively 29 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%