2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.limno.2012.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current limitations of the stone crayfish distribution in Romania: Implications for its conservation status

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed stone crayfish decline is most likely driven by multiple factors. In accordance with previous research (Bohl, ; Pöckl and Streissl, ; Pârvulescu and Zaharia, ; Todorov et al ., ) the regression analysis demonstrated high importance of pristine headwater habitats with hard substrates for intact stone crayfish populations. Consequently, intensification of human riparian land‐use adversely affects presence probability and abundance of stone crayfish.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The observed stone crayfish decline is most likely driven by multiple factors. In accordance with previous research (Bohl, ; Pöckl and Streissl, ; Pârvulescu and Zaharia, ; Todorov et al ., ) the regression analysis demonstrated high importance of pristine headwater habitats with hard substrates for intact stone crayfish populations. Consequently, intensification of human riparian land‐use adversely affects presence probability and abundance of stone crayfish.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The dataset was obtained by field investigation of 243 rivers selected around the Romanian Carpathians during the summer season (July and August) between 2014 and 2015 in sites chosen according to the distribution data from Pârvulescu and Zaharia (, ). Crayfish presence/absence was assessed by using daylight hand sampling.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Although many populations of the species declined across its range, ongoing astacological research confirmed its wider presence in Bosnia and Herzegovina (Trožić-Borovac, 2011), Serbia, and Montenegro (Simić et al, 2008), as well as in Germany (Groß et al, 2008;Martin et al, 2008a). Substantial number of additional records has been also provided for previously underrepresented Romania (Pârvulescu and Zaharia, 2012;Pârvulescu et al, 2013), and the presumed original range of stone crayfish has been expanded to cover the Carpathian Arch there. All bulgarian Natura 2000 localities were recently investigated for presence of stone crayfish by Todorov et al (in press).…”
Section: > Austropotamobius Torrentium (Schrank 1803); Stone Crayfismentioning
confidence: 99%