2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current knowledge on boar sperm metabolism: Comparison with other mammalian species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
37
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These differences may be due to the unique characteristics of the boar sperm. For example, the motility of the pig sperm after ejaculation is slower than in other species (e.g., horse and cattle), while it is also very prone to be altered by a myriad of environmental incidences (Rodríguez-Gil and Bonet 2015). In light of these singularities, we addressed the question: which sperm quality factors are influencing SRR?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These differences may be due to the unique characteristics of the boar sperm. For example, the motility of the pig sperm after ejaculation is slower than in other species (e.g., horse and cattle), while it is also very prone to be altered by a myriad of environmental incidences (Rodríguez-Gil and Bonet 2015). In light of these singularities, we addressed the question: which sperm quality factors are influencing SRR?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exposure of boar spermatozoa to the μ‐agonist morphine reduces mitochondrial function, despite the maintained or elevated sperm motility. At face value, this would be a paradox; yet boar spermatozoa consume an abundance of glucose through glycolysis and respiratory oxidation (Rodriguez‐Gil and Bonet, ), so decreased mitochondrial integrity might not lead to an immediate energy deficit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vitro assays to assess different sperm functions are, at present, a very important tool to understand and discover the pathways implicated in sperm function and their changes. Different approaches are used nowadays to assess sperm features in vitro: sperm motility analysis systems (Amann and Katz, 2004;Hoogewijs et al, 2012;Boryshpolets et al, 2013;Amann and Waberski, 2014), morphology (Morrell, 2006;Love, 2011), fluorescent microscopy (Mattioli et al, 1996;Gravance et al, 2000;Flesch et al, 2001;Guthrie et al, 2008;Ortega Ferrusola et al, 2009;Satorre et al, 2009;Kim et al, 2011), protein analysis (Spinaci et al, 2005b;Krisfalusi et al, 2006;Gadella, 2008;Flores et al, 2011;Kumaresan et al, 2011), flow cytometry (Didion et al, 2009;Martìnez-Pastor et al, 2010;Petrunkina and Harrison, 2010;Hossain et al, 2011;Gürler et al, 2015;Barrier Battut et al, 2016;Battut et al, 2017), metabolic assay (Albarracín et al, 2004;Storey, 2008;Bucci et al, 2011;Gibb and Aitken, 2016;Rodríguez-Gil and Bonet, 2016); sperm oocyte interaction (Funahashi et al, 1997;Sinowatz et al, 2003;McPartlin et al, 2008;Mugnier et al, 2009; Balao da Silva et al, 2013;Plaza Dávila et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%