1978
DOI: 10.1086/156609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current interruption and impulsive flux transfer solar flare models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some experiments have used Ohm's law with assumptions in order to neglect terms to estimate the resistivity. [34][35][36] It is not clear if their conclusions are valid. The closest experiment to this one was reported by Intrator et al 21 The flux ropes were produced by two plasma guns at the end of a vacuum vessel with an axial field and there was no background plasma.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some experiments have used Ohm's law with assumptions in order to neglect terms to estimate the resistivity. [34][35][36] It is not clear if their conclusions are valid. The closest experiment to this one was reported by Intrator et al 21 The flux ropes were produced by two plasma guns at the end of a vacuum vessel with an axial field and there was no background plasma.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiments have tried to correct for the boundary effects (Roehling 1963) but one cannot be sure the corrections are valid without corroborating sheath measurements. Other earlier experiments have used Ohm's law with various assumptions and neglected terms to estimate the resistivity (Baum et al 1978;Zarnstorff et al 1988 . 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3.1. Note further, this process provides a very plausible setting for the current interruption solar flare model (Baum et al, 1978;Baum and Bratenahl, 1982) of Alfven and Carlquist (1962) and Carlquist (1982).…”
Section: Impulsive Flux Transfer Eventsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The fibers, however, define the footpoints of field lines making up topologically distinct tubular flux cells. As these are shuffled about by the powerful convective motion below, EMF f s are generated (Baum, et al, 1978(Baum, et al, , 1979Bratenahl andd Baura, 1982) which drive the lively solar activity above, as Ionson (1985) mentioned yesterday. On this basis, we expect reconnection in pinch current sheets to be by far the dominant dynamic dissipation mode in the solar atmosphere.…”
Section: Scaling Wall Effects and Global Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%