2018
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.8b09251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current-Induced Forces for Nonadiabatic Molecular Dynamics

Abstract: We present general first principles derivation of expression for current-induced forces. The expression is applicable in non-equilibrium molecular systems with arbitrary intra-molecular interactions and for any electron-nuclei coupling. It provides a controlled consistent way to account for quantum effects of nuclear motion, accounts for electronic non-Markov character of the friction tensor, and opens way to treatments beyond strictly adiabatic approximation. We show connection of the expression with previous… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…we are in regime where bath induced correlations between many-body eigenstates of the system become less important). Relative accuracy of the generalized Head-Gordon and Tully expression in the case of weak system-bath interaction was demonstrated in our previous study [40] for a non-interacting model. As we showed in that study, nonequilibrium generalization of the Head-Gordon and Tully result comes from S 1 = S 3 and S 2 = S 4 subset of terms in the general expression (17).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…we are in regime where bath induced correlations between many-body eigenstates of the system become less important). Relative accuracy of the generalized Head-Gordon and Tully expression in the case of weak system-bath interaction was demonstrated in our previous study [40] for a non-interacting model. As we showed in that study, nonequilibrium generalization of the Head-Gordon and Tully result comes from S 1 = S 3 and S 2 = S 4 subset of terms in the general expression (17).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…We compare the Hubbard NEGF wit the mean-field standard NEGF treatment of Ref. [25] and with the nonequilibirum generalization [40] of the Head-Gordon and Tully expression [46]. As expected standard and Hubbard NEGF results coincide in non-and weakly interacting systems, while for strong intra-system interactions (coupling between molecular exciton and cavity mode) the mean-field treatment fails qualitatively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, perturbative expansion in the system-baths couplings in each order yields product of two multi-time correlation functions: one for the system and one for the . The technique appears to be quite stable over wide range of parameters, 69 helpful in evaluation of electronic friction in junctions, 70,71 and useful as a convenient tool in first principles simulations of optoelectronic devices. [56][57][58] It is important to realize, however, that requirement of equilibrium character of the…”
Section: Hubbard Negfmentioning
confidence: 99%