2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2008.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current in vitro methods in nanoparticle risk assessment: Limitations and challenges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
273
1
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 389 publications
(282 citation statements)
references
References 132 publications
3
273
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This assay is based on the reduction of the MTT dye by the mitochondria of the cells to a purple insoluble formazan [50] and is well recognised for detection of mitochondrial activity. [51] The current results showed the expected linear correlation between cell number and absorbance values for the MTT assay standard curves with an R 2 of ,0.98. The coefficient of variation for the technical replicates was consistently in range of 2-10 %, demonstrating that this assay is reliable and technically reproducible.…”
Section: Mtt Interference Assaysupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This assay is based on the reduction of the MTT dye by the mitochondria of the cells to a purple insoluble formazan [50] and is well recognised for detection of mitochondrial activity. [51] The current results showed the expected linear correlation between cell number and absorbance values for the MTT assay standard curves with an R 2 of ,0.98. The coefficient of variation for the technical replicates was consistently in range of 2-10 %, demonstrating that this assay is reliable and technically reproducible.…”
Section: Mtt Interference Assaysupporting
confidence: 54%
“…by reducing the amount of free MTT and causing a false negative result. [51] Belyanskaya et al demonstrated that single-walled carbon nanotubes significantly decreased the extent of the MTT reaction when assaying human A549 lung cancer cells. [57] Also, sodium titanate nanoparticles increase the MTT-formazan light absorption in a concentration-dependent manner, possibly due to light scattering effects.…”
Section: Mtt Interference Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nel et al have first raised this thought in 2006, emphasizing on the necessity to optimize the classical in vitro toxicity assays as they show several shortcomings when they are being applied for NP toxicity evaluation 28 . We believe that the major issues with the current in vitro methods are (i) the lack of a complete characterization of the particles, (ii ) the lack of standardisation and guidelines on how to perform a toxicological evaluation in vitro, (iii) the possibility of NP interfering with the assay and therefore lack of appropriate methods to evaluate nanotoxicity and (iv) the shortcomings inherent to the most used classical 2D monocultures 11,82,93,104,105 . It is therefore clear that further research on the optimization of methods is highly recommended in order to obtain reproducible data that would allow drawing firm conclusions regarding NP toxicity.…”
Section: Issues With Routine Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, MNP have been proposed for applications such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), drug delivery, cell sorting, hyperthermia, nanosensors and tissue engineering [2,3]. The development of new technologies implies the need to determine their toxicity and to identify potential risks and side effects that could arise from their use, especially important in the case of nanotechnology [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%